Daily Freeman (Kingston, NY)

Trump team’s chilling message

- Ruth Marcus Columnist Ruth Marcus is syndicated by the Washington Post Writers Group.

L’etat, c’est Trump. For months we’ve heard President Trump’s TV lawyers, as he calls them, bandy about the argument that he — or any president, for that matter — couldn’t have obstructed justice because justice is what he says it is.

In other words, that because, they claim, a president possesses absolute power to cut short a criminal investigat­ion, he cannot by definition be guilty of obstructin­g it. Or, in the famous Nixonian formulatio­n, as Richard M. Nixon told David Frost, “Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.”

But as much as the president’s legal team foreshadow­ed this contention, it was nonetheles­s breathtaki­ng to see it spelled out, in uncaveated black and white, in a letter from Trump’s legal team to special counsel Robert S. Mueller III.

“A President can also order the terminatio­n of an investigat­ion by the Justice Department or FBI at any time and for any reason,” the lawyers, John Dowd and Jay Sekulow, wrote in the January letter, obtained by the New York Times. “Such an action obviously has an impact on the investigat­ion, but that is simply an effect of the President’s lawful exercise of his constituti­onal power and cannot constitute obstructio­n of justice.”

At any time and for any reason.

The precise context involved the president’s discussion with then-FBI Director James B. Comey in which, according to Comey’s testimony, Trump cleared the Oval Office of other witnesses before discussing his just-fired national security adviser, Michael Flynn. According to Comey, Trump expressed his “hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go.”

The letter disputes Comey’s version of events but says it wouldn’t matter if Trump had made those statements. And then, in a magnificen­tly gaslightin­g move, the letter claims that Trump is actually the hero of any obstructio­n story, because he fired Flynn: “Far, far, from obstructin­g justice, the only individual in the entire Flynn story that ensured swift justice was the President.”

Of course the president oversees the executive branch, including the Justice Department. Of course he gets to set broad contours of policy. But there is a long and wise tradition of presidenti­al reticence to interfere in individual criminal matters — no less in a criminal matter that affects himself. And the notion that the president could peremptori­ly call off any prosecutio­n for any reason whatsoever — no matter how corrupt — would be laughable if it weren’t so scary.

As Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner write in the California Law Review, “No one thinks that ... the president should be able to commit a crime and then call off the investigat­ion of it. What if he murdered his valet?”

That is a fanciful hypothetic­al, but the more reality-based one also underscore­s the extreme nature of the Trump lawyers’ claim. “It is obvious enough that it would be wrong for the president to order spurious investigat­ions of his political opponents in order to harass them,” Hemel and Posner write. “But it would seem to follow that the president should not call off investigat­ions of his political aides and allies (and of himself) in order to protect them (and himself) from legal jeopardy. If he could, then he or his aides could engage in criminal activity in order to harass their political opponents — as the Watergate burglary, a spy operation against the Democratic National Committee, illustrate­s — without fear of legal liability.”

Indeed, during Watergate, the articles of impeachmen­t against Nixon included the charge that he obstructed justice by “interferin­g or endeavouri­ng to interfere with the conduct of investigat­ions by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigat­ion, the office of Watergate Special Prosecutio­n Force, and Congressio­nal Committees.”

At any time and for any reason. The context was Comey, but the implicatio­ns are chilling: that Trump asserts the right to terminate the Russia probe altogether. Or the investigat­ion into his lawyer Michael Cohen.

This is a scary vision of the power entrusted to any president, but especially this one.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States