Daily Freeman (Kingston, NY)

Barr sees way for census to ask legally about citizenshi­p

- By Mike Balsamo

Attorney General William Barr said Monday he sees a way to legally add a citizenshi­p question to the 2020 census, despite a Supreme Court ruling that blocked its inclusion, at least temporaril­y.

In an interview with The Associated Press, Barr said the Trump administra­tion will take action in the coming days that he believes will allow the government to ask the controvers­ial question. Barr would not detail the administra­tion’s plans, though a senior official said President Donald Trump is expected to issue a memorandum to the Commerce Department instructin­g it to require census respondent­s to say whether they are citizens.

The Supreme Court’s June ruling was a blow to Trump , who has been pressing for the government to ask about citizenshi­p on next year’s census. The U.S. Census Bureau’s experts have said demanding such informatio­n would discourage immigrants from participat­ing in the survey and result in a less accurate census. That in turn would redistribu­te money and political power away from Democratic-led cities where immigrants tend to cluster to whiter, rural areas where Republican­s do well.

Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Monday that Trump wants to add the demand for citizenshi­p informatio­n because he wants to “make America white again.”

Barr said he has been in regular contact with Trump over the issue.

“I agree with him that the Supreme Court decision was wrong,” said Barr. He said he believes there is “an opportunit­y potentiall­y to cure the lack of clarity that was the problem and we might as well take a shot at doing that.”

The Trump administra­tion has argued that the question was being added to aid in enforcing the Voting Rights Act, which protects minority voters’ access to the ballot box. But Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court’s four more liberal members in last month’s Supreme Court decision, saying the administra­tion’s justificat­ion for the question “seems to have been contrived.”

It’s unclear what new rationale for asking the question the administra­tion might include in a presidenti­al memorandum.

As the administra­tion grapples for a way around the Supreme Court’s ruling, the Justice Department has shaken up its legal team handling the matter.

“Since these cases began, the lawyers representi­ng the United States in these cases have given countless hours to defending the Commerce Department and have consistent­ly demonstrat­ed the highest profession­alism, integrity and skill inside and outside the courtroom,” department spokeswoma­n Kerri Kupec said in a statement.

A department official told the AP the new team would consist of both career and politicall­y appointed attorneys. James Burnham, a top lawyer in the department’s civil division, would no longer be leading the litigation team, said the official, who spoke only on condition of anonymity to discuss the matter ahead of the court filing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States