Daily Local News (West Chester, PA)

Government focuses on police treatment of mentally ill

- By Eric Tucker

WASHINGTON >> Justice Department lawyers investigat­ing police agencies for claims of racial discrimina­tion and excessive force are increasing­ly turning up a different problem: officers’ interactio­ns with the mentally ill.

The latest example came in Baltimore, where a critical report on that department’s policies found that officers end up in unnecessar­ily violent confrontat­ions with mentally disabled people who in many instances haven’t even committed crimes. The report cited instances of officers using a stun gun to subdue an agitated man who refused to leave a vacant building and of spraying mace to force a troubled person — said by his father to be unarmed and off his medication­s — out of an apartment.

Though past federal investigat­ions have addressed the problem, the Baltimore report went a step further: It was the first time the Justice Department has explicitly found that a police department’s policies violated the Americans with Disabiliti­es Act. The finding is intended to chart a path to what federal officials hope will be far-reaching improvemen­ts, including better training for dispatcher­s and officers, diversion of more people to treatment rather than jail and stronger relationsh­ips with mental health specialist­s.

“Through the course of our work in the last several years on this bucket of issues, we’ve seen how important it is to get at the mental health issues as early in the system as possible,” Vanita Gupta, head of the department’s Civil Rights Division, said in an interview.

Civil rights officials say the Baltimore report builds on work they’ve done in investigat­ing the treatment of the mentally ill in various settings. In Mississipp­i, the Hinds County Jail in June recently agreed to better screening for mental illness and to provide individual­ized treatment for those with serious disabiliti­es, and the Justice Department sued the state as a whole this month, saying it was illegally making mentally ill people go into staterun psychiatri­c hospitals

But it’s the work with police department­s that often attracts the most attention. Even as police forces improve training and develop interventi­on teams to respond to individual­s in the throes of a crisis, concerns remain that officers aren’t adequately equipped for the situations and are being forced to fill the void of a resource-starved mental health infrastruc­ture. More than 14 percent of male jail inmates and 31 percent of female inmates are affected by serious mental illness, according to a July speech by Justice Department official Eve Hill, who said society has for too long relied on arrests and jail rather than treatment for the mentally ill.

“From the standpoint of police, they are somewhat frustrated because many of the people who are walking the streets and who are in need of help are not getting it,” said Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum. “They have been out on the streets, they can’t afford medication, and so the police wind up being the only one they come in contact with.”

The Justice Department has incorporat­ed treatment of the mentally ill into several of its wide-ranging civil rights investigat­ions of troubled police department­s.

“I think some police department­s have really made it a priority and are doing quite a bit. I don’t know that that’s consistent across all the department­s,” said Amy Watson, a mental health policy professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

A 2011 Justice Department report on Seattle criticized officers for too quickly resorting to force when encounteri­ng people with mental illness or under the influence of drugs. In Cleveland, officers were found to use stun guns against people with limited cognitive abilities, and in one case used one on a suicidal deaf man who may not have understood their commands, according to a 2014 report. Albuquerqu­e, New Mexico officers responding to a domestic violence complaint used the same tactic on a man who had doused himself with gasoline, the Justice Department said.

Those cities have since reached court-enforceabl­e consent decrees aimed at overhaulin­g practices.

The Portland police department, which also came under investigat­ion, agreed to new training and accountabi­lity measures under a settlement. A federal monitor in February found the Seattle police department was sending trained crisis interventi­on officers to “crisis events in the great majority of instances” and had given some level of training to all officers in the last two years. A report this month from the Seattle police found that only 1.6 percent of crisis cases reported during the past year involved any reportable use of force.

Federal officials hope for a similar resolution in Baltimore, where the Justice Department says police have provided minimal training on responding to mental health crises. Under an agreement in principle, Baltimore has pledged to work more closely with disability organizati­ons and mental health providers.

But, Gupta said, improvemen­ts can occur only if there’s a system with resources in place to help the police.

“It’s not about casting blame on specific actors. It’s about making sure that there is adequate support for community-based mental health services in compliance with federal law,” she said.

Ray Kelly, co-director of the No Boundaries Coalition, a Baltimore advocacy group, said he didn’t believe Baltimore police have succeeded in separating lawabiding citizens from criminal suspects, “so they definitely don’t take the time to separate the mentally ill from the criminal element or the average Joe buying drugs on one of our corners.”

He said he hoped the report would foster better collaborat­ion between police and mental health experts, so that if there’s a possibilit­y that officers are dealing with someone who’s disabled, they “would call a profession­al that’s prepared to work with this instead of using aggressive manhandlin­g tactics like they’ve used in the past.”

“From the standpoint of police, they are somewhat frustrated because many of the people who are walking the streets and who are in need of help are not getting it.” — Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States