Daily Local News (West Chester, PA)

Trump’s solid debate performanc­e disappears in an instant

- Byron York Columnist Byron York is chief political correspond­ent for The Washington Examiner.

Standing in a garish hotel lobby, casino music pounding, a Republican who has worked hard to help Donald Trump couldn’t quite believe how the final presidenti­al debate had ended just a couple of hours earlier.

“He had a home run going -- a home run -- and then he pissed it away in ten seconds,” the person said. “Could he just try to win?”

The Republican was referring, of course, to Trump’s refusal to promise that he will abide by the results of the election, should he lose. “I will look at it at the time,” Trump said. “I will keep you in suspense.”

It seemed a crazy answer for a number of reasons, not least of which was that in the first debate, when Trump was asked, “Will you accept the outcome of the election?” he answered, “If (Hillary Clinton) wins, I will absolutely support her.” Then, Wednesday night, for reasons unknown, Trump said something completely different.

His comments electrifie­d the press, resulting in furious questionin­g of Trump surrogates, who flatly contradict­ed their candidate and said that yes, Trump will accept election results. There were banner headlines. Trump’s remarks -- those few seconds -- became virtually the only story of the evening.

A few miles away, on the Vegas Strip, 26 uncommitte­d Nevada voters were watching the debate with the Republican consultant Frank Luntz. Although their minds weren’t fully made up, when Luntz pressed them on how they leaned, nine tilted toward Trump, eight toward Clinton, and nine were truly uncommitte­d. They had been given dials on which to register their reaction to everything the candidates said in real time. The dials controlled three lines on a screen, one each representi­ng the Clinton and Trump leaners and the undecided.

Unlike in the media room at the debate site, Trump’s willyou-accept-the-results-of-theelectio­n answer was not a bombshell in the focus group. When Trump began to answer, the line representi­ng his leaners actually went up a bit. The line for undecided voters went down a bit, but quickly moved above the neutral line into positive territory. Even the line representi­ng Clinton leaners wasn’t very low, just below the neutral line. No lines plunged. It did not seem as if the moment had really registered.

A short time later, all the lines rose -- Clinton, Trump, and undecided --in a positive response to Clinton’s declaratio­n that presidenti­al candidates must accept the outcome of a free and fair election.

Questioned afterward, a few members of the focus group defended Trump. “It should be perfectly acceptable for him to say he’ll make that decision when the time comes,” argued one man.

But others, even some who leaned toward Trump, didn’t like what they heard. “It makes me very frustrated,” said one woman, “because he should say yes.”

Trump had a few real loser lines, too. For example, when he said, “Nobody has more respect for women than I do,” all three lines, including his leaners, plunged. Nobody was buying that one.

But in general, Trump had a good night, a solid performanc­e. When Luntz asked who won, the decision was Trump 14, Clinton 12. That might as well be a tie, but it was certainly an indication that Trump had at least as good a night as Clinton.

Until the question about the results of the election.

Perhaps Trump’s performanc­e in the rest of the debate wasn’t quite the home run the Republican in the hotel lobby said. But it was good, and Trump was headed toward his best debate of the campaign -- until those few seconds that turned the night completely around.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States