Daily Local News (West Chester, PA)

Reps vote to roll back gun restrictio­ns

Rules were aimed at keeping guns away from mentally ill

- By Evan Brandt ebrandt@21st-centurymed­ia.com @PottstownN­ews on Twitter

WASHINGTON >> A rule adopted by the Obama administra­tion last year aimed at restrictin­g gun purchases by veterans deemed to be mentally incompeten­t to manage their benefits took an important step toward being rolled back last week with the help of votes from three area Republican Congressme­n.

U.S. Reps. Ryan Costello, R-6, Pat Meehan, R-7, and Brian Fitzpatric­k, R-8, all voted for the Veterans Second Amendment Protection Act in a March 16 vote which won approval by a 240 to 175 vote margin.

Critics say the bill would allow at-risk veterans easy access to firearms and increase their risk of suicide, already statistica­lly higher than other citizens.

Supporters say the rule denied veterans a constituti­onal right without a hearing and was so broad it was restrictin­g firearm purchases by veterans who could not be shown to be a danger to themselves or to others.

“Representa­tive Elizabeth Esty (D-Conn.), a member of the House Veterans Affairs Committee who represents the district where the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting took place, said the bill, introduced in February, was rushed to considerat­ion on the House floor, and argued it would make it easier for veterans in crisis to purchase guns,” according to a report in Newsweek.

She offered an amendment calling for a study on the poten-

tial impact of the change first, but it was rejected by the House Committee on Veterans Affairs.

Phil Roe, the Tennessee Republican who sponsored the bill and is chairman of the House Committee on Veterans Affairs, said the rule “deprives veterans of their constituti­onal rights without due process of law,” adding “veterans who fought to defend the Constituti­on should also be allowed the rights to protect it,” Newsweek reported.

Last week’s vote on the veterans bill is separate but similar to one taken a month ago which called for rolling back a rule that required the Social Security Administra­tion to disclose to the national gun background check system informatio­n about people who had filed for disabiliti­es due to mental illness.

Republican­s argued this could have led to an inability to obtain gun permits even if a recipient’s disability had something to do with an issue that would make them a danger to themselves or others if allowed to purchase a firearm, like an eating disorder.

That rule, adopted on Dec. 19, 2016 by the Social Security Administra­tion,

would not have gone into effect until Dec. 19 of this year. Its retraction was also supported by votes from Costello, Meehan and Fitzpatric­k and passed by a similar margin — 235 to 180 — on Feb. 2.

Both rules began after the 2007 shooting at Virginia Tech, when President George W. Bush signed a bill requiring all federal agencies — including the VA — to submit to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System the names of individual­s who because of mental incompeten­cy are legally prohibited from possessing guns.

“Since then, the VA has submitted more than 174,000 names of veterans suffering from mental problems such as long-term post-traumatic stress disorder, schizophre­nia and dementia, according to the Veterans Coalition for Common Sense, a group establishe­d by former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), who became a gun-violence prevention activist after being shot,” Newsweek reported.

Of those servicemen and women, 19,000, or 11 percent, suffer from schizophre­nia and another 15,000, or 8.6 percent, have severe post-traumatic stress disorder.

But opponents argue that many of the other 174,000 U.S. Rep. Pat Meehan, R-7 were unconstitu­tionally restricted from purchasing firearms and many lacked the legal resources to have their names removed from the restricted list.

Both the National Rifle Associatio­n and American Civil Liberties Union opposed the rule repealed last month on the grounds that it was too broad and someone could be designated from the Social Security Administra­tion database for conditions that would not otherwise stop a gun purchase.

Costello offered a similar rationale for his vote on the veterans measure last week.

“A central tenet of constituti­onal law is the right to a hearing prior to losing a constituti­onal right and this legislatio­n aims to ensure this tenet,” Costello wrote to Digital First Media in response to an inquiry.

“As I have stated previously, the U.S. Supreme U.S. Rep. Brian Fitzpatric­k, R-8 Court has held that reasonable regulation­s on the possession of firearms do not violate the Second Amendment — and I support solutions that pass constituti­onal muster to stop firearms from getting into the hands of criminals and those who lack the mental capacity to safely and responsibl­y possess them,” Costello wrote, adding that he consider’s Pennsylvan­ia’s “Instant Check System” to be an example of how such regulation­s should be implemente­d.

Costello’s office provided informatio­n explaining that the “Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA) may appoint a fiduciary agent for a veteran who is deemed unable to manage his or her veterans’ benefits.”

More important to Costello’s position, “if a hearing is held regarding this status, the result is to provide informatio­n as to

whether the veteran is capable of managing their benefits — not whether or not the veteran presents a danger to themselves or to others. The VA, however, is providing informatio­n to the NICS about veterans who are unable to manage their benefits as being mentally incompeten­t.”

The bill passed in the house last week has the support of the American Legion and the Veterans of Foreign Wars.

However, prior to the vote, 14 retired admirals and generals from all branches of the military — including General David Petraeus, a former CIA director, Admiral Thad Allen and Generals Michael Hayden and Stanley McChrystal — sent a letter to congressio­nal leaders urging them to oppose the bill, Newsweek reported.

Writing under the “Veterans Coalition for Common Sense” letterhead, the letter noted, in part, “We know that non-deployed veterans are at a 61 percent higher risk of suicide compared to the American civilian population, and deployed veterans are at a 41 percent higher risk. Firearms are the most lethal means when it comes to suicide, resulting in death nine out of ten times. When vulnerable veterans have access to firearms, they can do harm not only to themselves but

also to family members and loved ones.”

According to the Department of Defense’s 2014 Suicide Event Report, which was published last year, an average of 20 veterans commit suicide each day, twothirds of whom do so by using a firearm, Newsweek reported.

Costello has frequently spoken out on veterans issues.

In a 2015 speech on the floor of the House, Costello gave a speech in which he called for more awareness about suicide risk among veterans.

“We also need to raise awareness about the invisible wounds many of them face. I am speaking about post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, depression, which can and often does lead to thoughts of suicide,” Costello said in the Sept. 24, 2015 speech, which called for the passage of the Female Veteran Suicide Prevention Act.

The Republican majority in Congress is rolling the two regulation­s back — among a host of others from previous administra­tions — using the Congressio­nal Review Act which is not subject to a Senate filibuster.

The Senate is expected to approve the veterans measure and President Donald Trump is expected to sign it, according to national reports.

 ??  ?? U.S. Rep. Ryan Costello, R-6
U.S. Rep. Ryan Costello, R-6
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States