Daily Local News (West Chester, PA)

Time to tame the beast of redistrict­ing

-

Pat Meehan is a busy guy. His 7th District Congressio­nal seat has always covered the bulk of Delaware County.

But these days he has to “represent” a few more constituen­ts. That’s because “Delaware County’s congressma­n” is now wearing a few more hats.

He’s also, in part, Chester County’s congressma­n.

And Berks County’s congressma­n.

And Montgomery County’s congressma­n.

And Lancaster County’s congressma­n.

That’s right, the 7th District now zigs and zags its way through parts of five different suburban Philadelph­ia counties.

That is due to something called gerrymande­ring. A little bit like making sausage, it’s something best not viewed up close.

Every 10 years, congressio­nal districts are reshaped to take into account the difference­s in the latest census. The next change will reflect the 2020 Census changes.

What this is really all about is political power. Those in control of our ruling bodies bend and shape the districts to benefit themselves and their candidates.

A few years back, the 7th District was considered a toss-up. That’s when upstart Democrat Joe Sestak ended Curt Weldon’s 20-year reign in Washington. But Sestak had bigger fish to fry and gave up the seat in order to challenge – first his own party – then the GOP in a failed bid for the U.S. Senate.

He beat Republican-turnedDemo­crat incumbent Sen. Arlen Specter in the Democratic Primary in a move that infuriated his own party leaders, only to fall to conservati­ve Republican Pat Toomey in the general election.

Meehan stepped into the vacuum and put the 7th District back in Republican hands. Then redistrict­ing kicked in and made it much more likely that it will remain a solid red district. Since then Meehan has cruised to three straight general election wins, routinely gathering 60 percent of the vote.

Don’t blame Meehan; this is an equal opportunit­y political power play. Democrats have not been shy about bending political boundaries to fit their needs when they are in power as well.

It’s pure politics, and it needs to change.

Thankfully, there is a movement to do just that.

A group called Fair Districts PA has been making the rounds across the state stating the evils of gerrymande­ring and urging changes in the way the state handles redistrict­ing.

“Pennsylvan­ia is one of the most gerrymande­red states in the nation, because lawmakers draw the borders of their own voting districts,” says Carol Kuniholm, Fair Districts PA chair. “Politician­s are picking their voters, not the other way around.”

The folks who coined the term “gerrymande­ring,” so named for Massachuse­tts Gov. Elbridge Gerry, who back in 1812 signed a bill that benefitted his Democratic-Republican Party by redistrict­ing a portion of the city in the shape of a mythologic­al salamander, would no doubt snicker at the bizarre shape of today’s 7th District.

It is the poster boy for redistrict­ing ills.

Fair District PA wants that to change. So do we.

And they’re not alone. There is a push in Harrisburg, sparked in large part by the outcry over the last redistrict­ing fiasco, to get this power out of the hands of politician­s.

The state Constituti­on says each legislativ­e district “shall be composed of compact and contiguous territory as nearly equal in population as practicabl­e . ... Unless absolutely necessary no county, city, incorporat­ed town, borough, township or ward shall be divided in forming either a senatorial or representa­tive district.”

We would propose the 7th District as Exhibit A of flying in the face of that mandate.

Politician­s have been doing this for years, yes, going back to the those days in Massachuse­tts in the early 1800s. That doesn’t make it right. It’s heartening to see the turnout at these meetings held by Fair District PA.

There seems to be a realizatio­n of what is at stake. Maybe, just maybe, voters are starting to come around as well.

Gerrymande­ring cheats those citizens out of their most precious constituti­onal right – a vote that counts.

Here’s a vote for changing this blatant political tool and putting the power back where it is supposed to be – in the hands of the voters.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States