Daily Local News (West Chester, PA)

But her emails? Yes, Madam Secretary, your emails

- Marc A. Thiessen Columnist

When the Justice Department inspector general’s report revealed that former FBI director James B. Comey had used a personal email account to conduct official business, Hillary Clinton claimed vindicatio­n. “But my emails,” she tweeted.

Yes, Madam Secretary, your emails.

In fact, the overlooked bombshell of the report is the inspector general’s confirmati­on that classified informatio­n contained in Clinton’s emails was in fact compromise­d by foreign intelligen­ce services, and that Clinton had recklessly emailed President Barack Obama using her unsecured personal email from the territory of a hostile foreign adversary.

Before the report was released, we knew from Comey’s July 2016 statement that Clinton’s private emails included “seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received.” We also knew that the FBI “also found informatio­n that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligen­ce Community at the time it was discussed on email.” Comey further declared, “We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account.” And he speculated that, given how “extremely careless” Clinton had been, it was “possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.”

Well, it turns out, the FBI knew with certainty at the time that hostile actors had in fact gained access to classified informatio­n via Clinton’s emails. According to the inspector general, a special review of the Clinton email investigat­ion in 2017 by the Office to the FBI’s Inspection Division (INSD) found that, before Comey’s 2016 statement, “the FBI ... successful­ly determined classified informatio­n was improperly stored and transmitte­d on Clinton’s email server, and classified informatio­n was compromise­d by unauthoriz­ed individual­s, to include foreign government­s or intelligen­ce services, via cyber intrusion or other means.”

The initial draft of Comey’s 2016 statement said it was “reasonably likely” that hostile actors had gained access to Clinton’s private email account. Moreover, the inspector general quotes FBI agent Peter Strzok as commenting on that “It is more accurate to say we know foreign actors obtained access to some of her emails (including at least one Secret one) via compromise­s of the private email accounts of some of her staffers”. These facts were inexplicab­ly left out of the final statement.

We still don’t know the full extent of the damage Clinton caused. The report notes that “Strzok further stated that the FBI’s ‘purpose and mission’ was not to pursue ‘spilled informatio­n to the ends of the earth’ and that the task of cleaning up classified spills by State Department employees was referred back to the State Department.”

When I worked in the George W. Bush White House, and traveled to certain foreign countries with the president, we were required by the Secret Service to remove the batteries from our BlackBerry­s, place them in a sealed plastic bag, and leave them on Air Force One for the duration of our visit to prevent foreign adversarie­s from hacking into the White House email system. But Clinton was so cavalier that she actually used not her government communicat­ions device, but her unsecured private email to communicat­e with the president of the United States from the territory of a foreign adversary. By emailing Obama directly from hostile territory, she put both her own email system and the president’s at risk of foreign intrusion.

Many Democrats blame Comey’s July 2016 statement for causing Clinton irreparabl­e harm in the election. But we now know Clinton’s actions were worse than what Comey presented to the American people. Just imagine if his statement had been full and complete.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States