Daily Local News (West Chester, PA)

A look at companies embroiled in recent political debates

- By Alexandra Olson

NEW YORK » Nike’s “Just Do It” campaign featuring Colin Kaepernick is a rare example of a brand jumping into a divisive issue uninvited. Still, like it or not, American companies are increasing­ly being pulled into the country’s political and cultural wars.

Here’s a look at other companies that recently have courted controvers­y or been caught in political turbulence. PATAGONIA The outdoor retailer dived head first into politics last year with a campaign against President Donald Trump’s move to dramatical­ly shrink two Utah national monuments. On the day of Trump’s announceme­nt, the California-based retailer replaced its usual home page last with a black screen and stark message: “The President Stole Your Land.” The company also filed a lawsuit to block the planned reduction to Utah’s Bears Ears National Monument. The move sparked a furious response from Trump and Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, who accused the company of lying. But the campaign was in keeping with Patagonia’s longtime environmen­tal advocacy. The company had lobbied hard for the designatio­n of Bears Ears, created by President Barack Obama in 2016. Other outdoor retailers including The North Face, Keen, Black Diamond and REI also protested Trump’s plan on social media, but Patagonia was the only one to file a lawsuit. DELTA AIRLINES Delta Airlines was only one of many companies that made policy changes in the wake of the Feb. 14 school shooting in Parkland, Florida, but it faced the most notable retaliatio­n. The airliner stopped offering fare discounts to NRA members after the massacre, a decision the company said was an effort to remove itself from the debate, not take sides. Still, Georgia state lawmakers swiftly punished the Atlantabas­ed company by killing a proposed tax break on fuel. It was a stunning and risky rebuke to one of George’s largest private employers. Delta stood by its decision, and in March, the company donated three round-trip charter flights that allowed hundreds of Parkland’s Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School students to participat­e in protests against gun violence in Washington.

CITIGROUP

Citigroup became the first bank to announce policy changes after the Parkland massacre, announcing it would require its clients and business customers not to sell a gun to anyone who hasn’t passed a background check or anyone under the age of 21. The bank also will not allow its customers to sell what are known as bump stocks and high-capacity magazines. Other financial industry players followed with their own measures, including Bank of America, which cut off financing to companies that make AR-style rifles. The Republican chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, Sen. Mike Crapo, sent letters of protest accusing both banks of trying to usurp the role of policy makers. Retailers including Walmart Inc., Dicks Sporting Goods, Kroger Co. and L.L. Bean also responded to the shooting with measures tightening their restrictio­ns on gun sales. STARBUCKS Starbucks faced a backlash three years ago when it encouraged employees to write “Race Together” on its coffee cups to encourage a national conversati­on on race amid protests over police killings of black men. The initiative was in line with the Seattle-based company’s efforts to project a progressiv­e image, but social media users ridiculed it as a stunt to drive up sales. Then-CEO Howard Schultz defended the campaign as part of a broader push that included investing in underserve­d communitie­s and striving to diversify its workforce. Starbucks again became embroiled in racial issues earlier this year over the arrest of two black men at one of its stores in Philadelph­ia. CEO Kevin Johnson moved swiftly to quell the uproar, meeting personally with the two men and closing most of its U.S. stores for an afternoon in May to conduct anti-bias training. MERCK Merck CEO Kenneth Frazier, at the time one of only four African-Americans leading a Fortune 500 company, was the first to resign from Trump’s business councils last summer over the president’s remarks on the white nationalis­t protests in Charlottes­ville, Virginia. The president lashed out immediatel­y, criticizin­g Frazier on Twitter over drug pricing. Some business leaders quickly followed Frazier’s lead, including the CEOs of Under Armour and Intel. Others, including the heads Walmart and Johnson & Johnson, publicly condemned Trump’s remarks but initially resisted pressure to leave the councils. Within days, however, the ballooning uproar pushed the companies to shift course, and the panels fell apart. UBER Shortly after Trump took office in 2017, then-Uber CEO Travis Kalanick quit Trump’s council of business leaders after an outcry from Uber customers and employees who were upset about the administra­tion’s travel ban on people from seven majority-Muslim countries. Other Silicon Valley giants also took a strong stand against the ban in ads, including Google, Apple, Microsoft, eBay, Netflix, Facebook and Twitter. Through ads, public statements and court filings, CEOs spoke out about the reliance of high tech on immigrants. Tech companies also spoke out forcefully against the Trump administra­tion’s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which allows some people brought to the company illegally as children to stay. BANK OF AMERICA As the largest North Carolina-based company, Bank of America found itself squarely in the middle of the heated debate over a state law that required transgende­r people to use restrooms correspond­ing to the sex on their birth certificat­es in many public buildings. The bill prompted businesses, sporting events, convention­s and entertaine­rs pull out of the state in a yearlong economic backlash. Bank of America was among the leading critics of the bill, saying it was bad for business. The bank then supported a compromise bill last year that removed the requiremen­t but also made clear that only state legislator­s — not local government or school officials — can make rules for public restrooms from now on. Other companies, including IBM, were skeptical of the replacemen­t law. NORDSTROM Nordstrom incurred Trump’s wrath last year when it stopped selling daughter Ivanka’s clothing and accessorie­s. The move came amid a social media campaign called “Grab Your Wallet,” urging a boycott of stores that stocked Ivanka Trump or Donald Trump products. But Nordstrom said its decision was based on the sales performanc­e of the first daughter’s brand. Other retailers have attempted a delicate balance when it comes to the Ivanka Trump brand, with some scaling back on the products or removing them from their online sites. HARLEY-DAVIDSON Several companies have been pulled into controvers­y by Trump himself. Most recently, Harley-Davidson drew the president’s ire when it announced plans to move production of motorcycle­s sold in Europe to facilities outside the U.S, citing tariffs imposed by the European Union to retaliate for tariffs Trump imposed on a host of EU products. Trump said last month that his administra­tion is courting other motorcycle companies that want to move to the U.S. OTHER COMPANIES Amazon is a favorite Trump target, with the president earlier this year criticizin­g the online retailer’s business deal with the U.S. Postal Service. Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Toyota have also been on the receiving end of Trump’s Twitter tirades. In December 2016, shares of Lockheed Martin slumped when Trump, then the president-elect, lambasted the cost of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter built by the defense giant.

 ?? MARK LENNIHAN — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? People pass a Nike store in New York, Tuesday. An endorsemen­t deal between Nike and Colin Kaepernick is prompting a flood of debate online as sports fans react to the apparel giant backing an athlete known mainly for starting a wave of protests among NFL players of police brutality, racial inequality and other social issues.
MARK LENNIHAN — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS People pass a Nike store in New York, Tuesday. An endorsemen­t deal between Nike and Colin Kaepernick is prompting a flood of debate online as sports fans react to the apparel giant backing an athlete known mainly for starting a wave of protests among NFL players of police brutality, racial inequality and other social issues.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States