Daily Local News (West Chester, PA)

Analysis: Mueller has spoken, but 2020 may be the final word

- By LisaMascar­o

WASHINGTON >> Robert Mueller’s testimony Wednesday sent the clearest signal yet that impeachmen­t may be slipping out of reach for Democrats and that the ultimate verdict on President Donald Trump will be rendered by voters in the 2020 election.

Democrats had hoped the former special counsel’s appearance would be a turning point. A Marine who served in Vietnam, Mueller is the kind of square- jawed federal prosecutor to whom Americans may have once listened as a trusted source of authority. But in this era of stark political polarizati­on, galvanizin­g the public is a difficult task even if Mueller wanted to produce a viral moment, which he never seemed inclined to do. Rather than swoop in to give voice to the 448- page report, Mueller said very few words.

What Mueller did say was striking: Trump was not exonerated of potential crimes. His report found Russia interfered in the 2016 election in “sweeping and systematic” fashion. Accepting foreign campaign assistance is wrong, he agreed. But Mueller’s reluctance to engage, and his one- word answers, deprived the country of a where- were- youwhen moment that could bring decisive conclusion to the probe and Trump’s role in trying to obstruct the investigat­ion.

“It was not a hoax,” Mueller testified of Russian election interferen­ce.

The result, after more than six hours at theHouse Judiciary and Intelligen­ce committees, was that the sides in Washington were retrenchin­g to their familiar outposts, leaving voters to decide what to do next.

Trump derided Mueller’s appearance — “disaster,” he tweeted — and started fundraisin­g off it. The president’s reelection campaign set a $ 2 million goal over 24 hours, it said, to counter those trying to “TRICK the American People into believing their LIES.”

Allies of the White House quickly joined in. GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina called Mueller’s appearance “sad.” Rep. Devin Nunes of California, the top Republican on the Intelligen­ce panel, said the hearing was the “last gasp” of the investigat­ion.

“It’s time for the curtain to close on the Russia hoax,” Nunes said. “The conspiracy theory is dead.”

Much was riding on Mueller’s appearance, coming months after the release of his report in April. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is weighing liberal calls for impeachmen­t against her own instincts for a more measured approach investigat­ing the Trump administra­tion and laying out the findings.

Activists on the party’s left flank have been impatient with what they see as Pelosi’s slow- walking of impeachmen­t — but they’ve also been deferentia­l to her strategy. More than 85 House Democrats have called for the House to begin impeachmen­t proceeding­s, and more lawmakers are expected to add their names after Mueller’s testimony.

Yet even though Democrats hold the House majority, they’re far from the 218 votes that would be needed to approve articles of impeachmen­t. With Republican­s controllin­g the Senate, many Democrats warn moving forward is a political dead end.

“If we have a case for impeachmen­t, that’s the place we will have to go,” Pelosi said afterward.

Mueller, in his testimony, didn’t push the issue any further. While Mueller’s teamdeclin­ed to prosecute the president, in part because of a Justice Department opinion against indicting a sitting president, the report also suggested other remedies, including in Congress. Asked about impeachmen­t as an optionWedn­esday, Mueller refused to comment on it.

The former special counsel was always going to be a reluctant witness who wanted his report to speak for itself. Democrats knew what they would encounter even if they were hoping for a Mueller of a different vintage, from his time leading the FBI after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.

Instead, they saw a less forceful public presence, hard of hearing at times, hesitant to answermany of the questions, but one still skilled enough in the ways of Washington to not read his report in a way that Democrats could exploit.

When Rep. Ted Lieu, D- Calif., asked if Mueller would read a certain section fromthe report, Mueller turned the tables: “I’m happy to have you read it.”

Republican­s had their own expectatio­ns and tried to portray Mueller as an actor in an elaborate attempt to undermine Trump’s election.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States