Writer prompts debate: Can Al Franken be rehabilitated?

Al Franken, the Minnesota Democrat and former “Saturday Night Live” star forced out of the Senate in late 2017 by # MeToo allegations, is back in the news.

The New Yorker has published a long article suggesting Franken was “railroaded” — author Jane Mayer’s word — and reporting that several of Franken’s old Senate colleagues now regret calling for him to resign.

Two reactions: First, Franken was railroaded. Faced with a number of iffy allegations, SenateDemocrats panicked and pushed him out before any investigation could be done. It was, as I wrote at the time, an example of the “kangaroo court justice of the college campus coming to the U. S. Senate.”

Second, it is striking that Mayer would come to Franken’s defense, and use the word “railroaded,” given that just last year she tried to railroad Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh with a flimsy, damning and unverified allegation of sexual misconduct. And, of course, in an earlier generation, Mayer tried to railroad Justice Clarence Thomas. The sheer partisanship would be funny if the results weren’t so serious.

Mayer’s newpiece examines the most- publicized allegation against Franken, that he inappropriately kissed Leeann Tweeden, a radio host with whom Franken appeared in a series of USOshows in 2006. It was themost publicized because Franken posed for a gag photo inwhich he appeared to be grabbing Tweeden’s breasts as she slept on a flight home fromthe USO tour.

Mayer applies all of her investigative skills to the case and discovers a number of holes in Tweeden’s story. ( The photo, however, is what it is, and Franken is still apologizing for it.) As for the other allegations against Franken — therewere seven other womenwho said he behaved inappropriately — Mayer implies that maybe there’s notmuch to them, either, although she did not actually check them out.

Of course, nobody really checked out any of the allegations in November and December 2017, when the Franken frenzy erupted. At the time, Democrats were trying to capitalize on accusations against Republican Senate candidate RoyMoore in Alabama and did not want to complicate matters by appearing to shield one of their own. So they dispensedwith even a hint of due process — in this case, an Ethics Committee investigation — and hustled Franken out the door.

Now, Mayer has found seven current or former Democratic senators who say they regret dumping Franken. But the regrets don’t matter. Once Franken resigned, no matter how precipitously, he was out.

There are two types of villains in the Franken story, as Mayer tells it. First are the accusers, whomshe suggests were conservatives targeting Franken for political reasons. Second are the senators who ran himout and still believe they did the right thing. Chief among them is Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, now a candidate for the Democratic nomination for president. Gillibrand has no regrets; she toldMayer the allegations against Franken were credible, and “he wasn’t entitled tome carrying his water, and defending him with my silence.”

Now Mayer is the one carrying the water. It’s not clear what effect, if any, herworkwill have on the Franken case. What is clear, though, is that Mayer’s rescuemission is not playingwell in progressive circles.

“Al Franken did the right thing by resigning; If he could remember that, everyonewould be better off,” was the headline of a story in Vox.

“What drove the NewYorker’s JaneMayer into Al Franken denialism?” asked Salon.

“What JaneMayer getswrong about Al Franken,” wrote Slate.

The articles all suggested that Mayer hadminimized the seriousness of Franken’s conduct, and that she did not fully appreciate the importance of Senate Democrats setting a standard of behavior for themselves in the # MeToo era. Some could not imagine the bad optics, had Franken not resigned, of him sitting on the Senate Judiciary Committee, of which hewas a member, during the Kavanaugh hearings.

That, of course, didn’t happen. And Frankenwon’t be back. Judging from reaction to the New Yorker story, he is unlikely to regain the support he once had in the progressive world— nomatter how hard somemight try to rehabilitate him.