Daily Local News (West Chester, PA)

The government agency harassing immigrants is going broke

- » Catherine Rampell Catherine Rampell Columnist

The immigratio­n agency admonishin­g immigrants to pull themselves up by their bootstraps seems to have destroyed its own boots.

For three years, U.S. Citizenshi­p and Immigratio­n Services — the federal agency that processes visas, work permits and naturaliza­tions — has lectured immigrants about how they should become more self-sufficient. It has alleged, without evidence, that too many immigrants are on the dole. (Actually, immigrants pay more in taxes than they receive in federal benefits, and the foreignbor­n use fewer federal benefits than do their native-born counterpar­ts.)

The agency implemente­d a broad, and likely illegal, rule allegedly designed to weed out immigrants who might ever be tempted to become a “public charge” and try to benefit from taxpayer largesse.

Well, now USCIS is broke — and is trying to become a “public charge” itself, by begging Congress for a bailout.

The agency is funded almost entirely by user fees, rather than congressio­nal appropriat­ions. But under President Donald Trump’s leadership, it has mismanaged its finances so badly that it has sought an emergency $1.2 billion infusion from taxpayers.

Unless it gets a bailout, the agency will furlough threequart­ers of its workforce next month, Government Executive reported Thursday.

It didn’t have to be this way. When Trump took office, USCIS inherited a budget surplus. Last year, the agency saw record highs in both revenue and revenue per user.

So what went wrong?

The administra­tion has frittered away funds on phantom cases of immigratio­n fraud — which, like the president’s allegation­s of voter fraud, it has struggled to prove is an actual widespread problem that’s been going undetected.

USCIS has siphoned resources to create a denaturali­zation task force, which strips citizenshi­p from immigrants found to have lied or otherwise cheated on applicatio­ns. Last year,the agency revealed intentions to double the size of its fraud detection unit.

The bigger drain on resources, though, is its deliberate creation of more busy work for immigrants and their lawyers — as well as thousands of USCIS employees. These changes are designed to make it harder for people to apply for, receive or retain lawful immigratio­n status.

For example, USCIS now rejects submission­s as “incomplete” if the entry field for an applicant’s middle name is blank, even if it’s left blank because the applicant doesn’t have a middle name. Sometimes, they’ll reject a form if the nonapplica­ble field says “NA” rather than specifical­ly “N/A.” In recent weeks, lawyers have told me they’ve received rejections because the name on the back of an attached photo was printed in ink, rather than pencil. And so on.

Such policies necessitat­e spending many more hours — and resources — processing every applicatio­n. The additional costs now required to process just five of the agency’s most common forms is more than $500 million per year, according to a forthcomin­g analysis of USCIS documents from immigratio­n experts Doug Rand and Lindsay Milliken.

So the agency is approachin­g Congress, hat in hand, for a bailout — and permission to gouge immigrants for even more money while continuing to deny these same immigrants due process. Congress should not reward this bad behavior. Nor should it let immigrants, or thousands of civil servants, be punished for the agency’s financial mismanagem­ent.

Instead, in exchange for any bailout, lawmakers should demand more transparen­cy, deadline extensions for immigrants affected by the pandemic, and specific policy changes.

The American Immigratio­n Lawyers Associatio­n and the American Immigratio­n Council offer a few obvious suggestion­s, including eliminatin­g some of the stupid processing requiremen­ts that raise costs for both applicants and USCIS without actually adding value. Other ways to reduce costs include holding virtual naturaliza­tion oath ceremonies and allowing electronic payments for everything.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States