Daily Local News (West Chester, PA)

Folcroft decriminal­izes small amounts of pot

- By Alex Rose arose@21st-centurymed­ia.com @arosedelco on Twitter

Borough council has “decriminal­ized” possession of a small amount of marijuana.

FOLCROFT » Borough council on Tuesday joined a growing number of municipali­ties in the state that have “decriminal­ized” possession of a small amount of marijuana in a bid to relieve both residents and the justice system of the burden of prosecutin­g simple possession offenses.

“This measure was long overdue,” said council President Joe Papaleo in a release. “The resources which are utilized to arrest and prosecute residents for simple possession can no longer be justified. The lifelong ramificati­ons of being put into the criminal justice system for an inconseque­ntial offense are severe and can also no longer be justified. I am proud to have been a participan­t and advocate of this unanimousl­y approved justice reform in my town.”

Folcroft now joins Philadelph­ia, Pittsburgh, Harrisburg, York, State College, Erie, Lancaster, Bethlehem, Norristown and Steelton in the state, as well as 27 states and Washington, D.C., who have some form of decriminal­ization on the books for marijuana.

Ordinance 2020-1, which took effect immediatel­y upon passage, defines a “small amount” as 30 grams or less of marijuana and eight grams or less of hashish. It notes that “personnel possession” does not include possession with intent to deliver, distribute, transfer or sell.

Any adult caught with a small amount of marijuana or parapherna­lia under the terms of the ordinance will be issued a nontraffic summary citation, which can also be mailed to the individual’s home address.

The process is somewhat more involved for minors, who will be temporaril­y detained, but law enforcemen­t will still follow the normal procedures for handling summary offenses committed by a minor.

This includes alerting a parent or guardian that the minor was caught in possession of marijuana or parapherna­lia, is

suance of a copy of the citation to the parent or guardian, advising them they are responsibl­e for paying a fine, and providing contact informatio­n for a local agency where substance abuse education and treatment programs are available.

Fines for possessing or using marijuana or parapherna­lia are each set at $100, though the court may suspend the fine at its discretion if the offender agrees to perform up to 25 hours of community service.

The release cites Uniform Crime Reports issued annually by the Federal Bureau of Investigat­ion, which indicate there were 663,367 marijuana law violation arrests nationwide in 2018, the last year on record. Of those, 608,775 were arrested for possession only, according to the FBI.

Giving officers the discretion to issue a citation rather than make an arrest frees up resources to combat crimes that endanger public safety and removes the trauma of going through the criminal court system for marijuana consumers, the release states.

Folcroft Police Chief William Bair said he was fine with enforcing the law prior to the ordinance because marijuana remains illegal federally and for non-medical use in the state, but he was equally fine with having discretion not to charge since most of those cases cost time and money for everyone involved with typically very little benefit.

“If it’s going to get thrown out or go to a disorderly conduct at the end of everything when it goes out to Media from here, we’re wasting our time,” he said. “An officer has to take the person, go fingerprin­t them, photograph them, and then come back and (write) a criminal complaint, so they’re tied up in that way, and now they have to go to court and that person doesn’t have an attorney, so then they have to continue it, and then continue it again, they have to get the drugs examined – you know, it’s a lot of different things to do and basically come out of it and it’s either thrown out because the court system is saying it’s just weed or just give them a disorderly conduct.”

There are also times when the lab used to identify the marijuana is backlogged for months, said

Bair, meaning the state has to continue the case at the magisteria­l district court level several times just to be able to present the evidence before the case can move on to Media. In the meantime, officers have to make those court dates, which means overtime, which means even more money being thrown into something that will most likely result in a $100 fine for disorderly conduct, which the borough will only see about half of.

Bair said that on one hand it is difficult to reconcile all the costs of bringing these cases – for both the state and the defendants, whose lives are also significan­tly disrupted – for something that will likely play out in the same way a simple citation would.

But on the other, Bair said he agrees officers need to be given the freedom to charge in certain circumstan­ces. For instance, a known heroin user busted with $10 worth of marijuana might not ultimately benefit from being issued a ticket, he said, but could be steered into treatment if officers have the ability to conduct an arrest and place them into custody.

Bair also warned that the ordinance is not a free pass to smoke marijuana in Folcroft, but is just one tool officers have to police their borough. Someone cited one or two times could still be subject to possible arrest on another offense if they don’t seem to be getting the message, he said.

“I think it will basically be that you’re still going to have some people that will just do it and will be pains in our butts, and they’re going to get charged sooner or later, and then you will have people that are like, ‘Look I’ve learned my lesson, I’m not going to do it again, I’m not going to be out there in public doing that.’ …I can tell you the answer to that probably in a year, if we do use it, or we don’t use it and how much we do use it. (Right now,) I don’t know.”

Morton Police Chief Joseph LaSpina said his department has been creatively treating a 1998 ordinance dealing with drug parapherna­lia in much the same manner as Folcroft’s new ordinance since he came on as chief in late 2016.

LaSpina said Morton’s ordinance – initially passed to block “head shops” from operating in the borough and selling to minors – makes it unlawful to possess or sell things like smoking devices and baggies.

“How it was worded was ‘possession of,’ and part of the ‘possession of’ was a baggie, a roach clip, a bong, or whatever it was,” he said. “Well, every time you have a small amount of marijuana, it’s in something.

It’s in a baggie, that’s considered parapherna­lia, so what I did is I used that as our ‘small amount’ instead of charging them criminally. I kind of got a little creative with the ordinance and it’s been very effective since then.”

LaSpina said his officers will confiscate the parapherna­lia, along with its contents, which is stored as evidence. Offenders are then issued a non-traffic summary citation, either through the mail or sometimes on the spot, but no arrests are made and no criminal charges are filed.

“It’s been really effective since I’ve been doing it,” said LaSpina. “I’ve been doing it for about two and a half, three years since we really got our teeth into it, and it’s not clogging up the court system, it’s saving our officers paperwork, time – you know, time is money – we’re keeping our officers on the street. People don’t have to get fingerprin­ted, we don’t have to take the evidence out to the lab to get it weighed and analyzed, and officers are spending less time in court and the people aren’t getting criminal records that they later have to get expunged. Sometimes people make these choices when they’re younger and they have to pay a lot for them when they get older.”

Morton’s ordinance caps fines at $1,000 plus costs, as well as attorneys’ fees, and can result in up to 90 days in prison if the fine is defaulted. But LaSpina said officers will typically work with the court to find a reasonable fine amount which is far below the maximum.

“Keep in mind that every case is an individual case, so I don’t have any obvious set rules for how I do this because every individual case is different,” said Magisteria­l District Judge Andrea Puppio, who handles cases originatin­g in Morton. “Having said that, when I get them, the only informatio­n I have is what’s contained in the citation, which often times is not a lot of informatio­n, but enough to tell me it falls within the statutes and where it is within the realm of the ordinance.”

Puppio said she will set a fine amount and then the defendant can enter a plea of guilty or not guilty. If they plead not guilty, they can request a hearing and the case will go from there. Otherwise, they might set some sort of payment plan for the fine and she usually won’t see them again after that unless they have a problem with the plan.

“If they request a hearing, they will have the hearing or the Morton police may come in and say, ‘I have spoken with this individual, they have agreed to plead guilty if you agree to lower the fine,’ and since the fine is a range, that can be done,” she said. “In addition to which, if I have a hearing and, let’s say, when the citation came in and I gave it a fine in the beginning – which I’m required to, you cannot do anything without the fine in there – I might hear all the evidence but don’t think you need to pay that much of a fine, I’m going to lower the fine.”

Puppio did not recall anecdotall­y what fine amounts she might have set in the past, noting the coronaviru­s has temporaril­y suspended hearing nontraffic citations for months, but LaSpina said using the citation system has worked out well so far, and other department­s in the county have begun to follow suit.

LaSpina noted Aston requested a copy of Morton’s ordinance after its officials heard what his department was doing, and Aston passed a similar parapherna­lia ordinance in July 2019. Aston Police Chief Daniel Ruggieri could not be reached for comment Wednesday, however, so it was unclear if it is being enforced in the same fashion as Morton.

“Obviously the district attorney is supportive of Folcroft’s decision because this is something he wanted to explore from the day he was sworn in – to try and work to (stop) people from being arrested for using marijuana, and fortunatel­y there is more widespread support for that than there has been historical­ly,” said Margie McAboy, a spokeswoma­n for county District Attorney Jack Stollsteim­er. “He sees it as part of a ‘smart on crime’ plan and there is a tentative plan to introduce an ordinance in front of Delaware County Council that would support decriminal­ization in other municipali­ties.”

A spokespers­on for county council did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

“I think there is a general acknowledg­ment that it is not the highest and best use of police officers’ time,” said McAboy. “The effect on the communitie­s is just absurd and disproport­ionate.”

She added that any countywide ordinance that may be passed would be narrowly tailored to only address small amounts of marijuana for personal use and would not hamper officer’s abilities to go after drug dealers.

“The idea would be that we would have this council legislatio­n – most likely an ordinance – and then municipali­ties would be free to define it slightly differentl­y,” said McAboy. “The default position would be to decriminal­ize, but then the boroughs could go further. Somehow we’ll thread the needle where we show deference to the municipali­ties, but at the same time try to accomplish this overarchin­g goal of decriminal­izing small amounts of marijuana.”

McAboy noted that the COVID-19 pandemic has already forced the county prison in Concord to halve its population with expedited plea bargains, release of probation- or parole-only offenders, and suspension of a partial confinemen­t program for low-level offenders, which she said has not caused the fabric of the community to unravel.

“I don’t think the fact that there are fewer people sitting in George Hill has caused things to fall apart in Delaware County,” she said. “Capacity is over 1,800, and it was routine to have 1,700 in there, and now it’s under 1,000. So that’s pretty remarkable and I like to think of that as fewer lives ruined.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ?? SUBMITTED PHOTO ?? Folcroft Borough Hall.
SUBMITTED PHOTO Folcroft Borough Hall.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States