Daily Local News (West Chester, PA)

Presidents Day salutes America’s remarkable leaders

- David Shribman David Shribman

In our current distress, and amid continuing contention over the last president, it might do us well to consider how remarkable have been the occupants of the White House — even the ones who rank lowest in historians’ polls.

In previous years, I have written derisively of Presidents Day, regretting that America’s schoolchil­dren no longer knew the meaning of Feb. 12 (Abraham Lincoln’s birthday) or Feb. 22 (George Washington’s), but instead get a day off for an anodyne Presidents Day, which was created 50 years ago, set for the third Monday in February.

The date was chosen as part of an effort to create three-day holidays, and it somewhat satisfied purists because it fell roughly between the birthdays of Lincoln and Washington. For many years, I was troubled that a broad Presidents Day honored James Buchanan (arguably partially responsibl­e for the Civil War) as well as Lincoln.

I knew then, and acknowledg­e now, that James Madison was right when he argued, in the Constituti­onal Convention on June 26, 1787, that, according to his notes, “Those chargd. [cq] with the public happiness, might betray their trust.” I knew then, and acknowledg­e now, that our leaders do not always meet the standard set by Madison when he argued, in Federalist Paper 57, “The aim of every political constituti­on is, or ought to be, first to obtain for rulers men who possess most wisdom to discern, and most virtue to pursue, the common good of the society.”

But by and large, the leaders who have ascended to the American presidency have been remarkable figures.

Time, of course, has worn away the partisan passions of the past, even the most incendiary; today we examine, for example, South Carolina’s rebellion against the tariff in its ordinance of nullificat­ion with dispassion, even though it was a deadly strike at the heart of the American nation. Similarly, the rough edges of Franklin Delano Roosevelt — revered by some, but considered so odious a figure by his opponents that they referred to him as “that man in the White House” rather than utter his name — have worn away. The homespun shortcomin­gs that critics of Harry Truman deplored so passionate­ly now are regarded among his most powerful virtues.

We seldom today pause to reflect on James A. Garfield, but he was a remarkable figure, a general in the Civil War, a member of the Ohio senate and the U.S. House, and was simultaneo­usly elected to the Senate and the presidency. America has seldom produced a figure like William Howard Taft, who served as judge, governor-general of the Philippine­s, and secretary of war before becoming president and chief justice.

Today we are aware that a dozen American presidents owned slaves, and there is no excusing slavery. It is hard to put a “but” after that, and I don’t propose to do so. Perhaps we condemn slavery for the crime against humanity it was and yet remember Washington for his participat­ion in slavery — and also for his stewardshi­p of the Revolution­ary army and the selfless example he set as the first president; Thomas Jefferson for celebratin­g liberty if not exactly practicing it; Madison for his vision as a constituti­onal thinker; and Ulysses Grant for defeating the Confederac­y and for his remark, in his memoir, about Robert

E. Lee and his Southern warriors: “I felt like anything rather than rejoicing at the downfall of a foe who had fought so long and valiantly, and had suffered so much for a cause, though that cause was, I believe, one of the worst for which a people ever fought, and one for which there was the least excuse.”

Now we confront the problem of Donald J. Trump, impeached twice, forever linked with traducing the truth, with seeking to overturn an election and with the rampaging trespasser­s on Capitol Hill, providing perhaps the darkest day in the capital and surely the most dangerous hour at the Capitol since the British invasion of 1814. His supporters revere him, his detractors deplore him, and history likely will treat him harshly.

Only a country rich in character could produce such figures — remembered, and appreciate­d, even in defeat.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States