Daily Local News (West Chester, PA)

Book World: Why was ‘The Office’ so successful? Kevin Malone, aka Brian Baumgartne­r, seeks answers in new book

- Thomas Floyd

Welcome to Dunder Mifflin: The Ultimate Oral History of The Office

By Brian Baumgartne­r and Ben Silverman

Custom House. 464 pp. $30 --The final episode of “The Office” aired on May 16, 2013. And yet the beloved mockumenta­ry has remained a steady favorite in the years since: In 2020, it was the most streamed show of the year, according to Nielsen. What explains the comedy’s enduring appeal? Michael’s endearing antics? The Pam and Jim saga? Dwight’s inept ambition?

Kevin Malone, the show’s slow-talking ac- countant, may seem an unlikely character to come up with the definitive an- swer, but Brian Baumgart- ner, who played the deli- ciously dull bean-counter, has taken a crack at it in a new book, “Welcome to Dunder Mifflin.”

The 48-year-old actor teamed up with producer Ben Silverman to create a book written in a style that’s less like a Hollywood nostalgia trip and more like a true-crime mystery. “Instead of why is this person missing or who killed this person or whatever, the mystery is: Why is this show now more watched than anything else?” Baumgartne­r said in a phone interview.

Baumgartne­r began by conducting hundreds of hours of interviews, with everyone from creator Greg Daniels and star Steve Carell to hairstylis­t Kim Ferry and cinematogr­apher Matt Sohn, for the podcasts “An Oral History of The Office” and “The Office Deep Dive.” In “Welcome to Dunder Mifflin,” excerpts from those recordings are interwoven with follow-up conversati­ons, exclusive set photos and fascinatin­g factoids -- including the *casting choices that almost were. The result is a 464-page tome that is the ultimate behind-thescenes account.

Earlier this month, Baumgartne­r discussed his approach to the book, what he learned in all those interviews and whether he cracked that central mystery.

((BEGIN ITAL)This conversati­on has been edited for length and clarity. (END ITAL))

Q: Your preface poses the book’s key question: “Why is ‘The Office’ different?” Why did you want to approach this oral history in that way?

A: To me, art on every level -- from theater, film, television, whatever -- is infinitely more interestin­g when it’s about a question as opposed to an answer, right? If I just tell you why this is great, that’s not so interestin­g. So let’s explore what happened and why now it’s popular.

Q: One of my favorite passages was when Stephen Merchant and Ricky Gervais, the creators of the original British version of “The Office,” got into the nitty-gritty of why they find cringe humor so funny. How important was it to offer that kind of insightful conversati­on about the show, and not just a grab-bag of behindthe-scenes tidbits?

A: One of the most interestin­g conversati­ons, which also came from Stephen Merchant and Ricky Gervais, really had to do with the fact that they did something that had never been done before, which was they inverted the love story between Jim and Pam [Tim and Dawn in the U.K. version]. As opposed to it being central -- which it is on every other television show -- they inverted that into the background. Yet, that is an iconic love story that people are still talking about today. But it existed in the corner, and they brought the buffoon [Carell’s Michael Scott] forward. For me, that exploratio­n is vital, as opposed to just, “Oh, when we were shooting this scene, this is something that happened behind the scenes.”

Q: How would you describe the dynamic of being both the interviewe­r facilitati­ng the conversati­ons and, as an actor from the show, one of the subjects that this book examines?

A: There was a substantia­l conversati­on early on about who should conduct these interviews. Should we get a real journalist in here to do this? And I very quickly arrived at [the conclusion] that I may not be a journalist, and I may not know exactly the right questions to ask, but what I did know was that I was going to get people to open up in a unique way. It doesn’t mean better, it doesn’t mean worse. But I thought, “If I do these interviews ... we’re going to be able to share stories that are unique and different.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States