Daily News (Los Angeles)

Despite surplus, the left wants tax hikes

-

With its $97.5-billion budget surplus, California has so much money the governor and Legislatur­e can’t figure out how to spend it all. They’re mostly concocting new social programs rather than addressing our fundamenta­l infrastruc­ture problems and longterm unfunded liabilitie­s.

Keep that in mind as progressiv­es again take aim at their bogeyman: Propositio­n 13. Passed in 1978 to keep California­ns from being taxed out of their homes, the “tax revolt” initiative caps property taxes at 1% plus local bonds, reassesses rates at a property’s sale price and limits annual property tax increases to 2%.

It provided a needed check on government excess, but unions and activists still plot the initiative’s demise. The latest fusillade is unusually bizarre. A Berkeley-based group called the Opportunit­y Institute, which features former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich on its board, details the propositio­n’s “Unjust Legacy.”

“Since 1980, California has experience­d a widening gap in homeowners­hip between Black households on the one hand and white and Asian American households on the other,” the report concluded.

How to have your say:

Perhaps we can blame Prop. 13 for climate change or the homelessne­ss crisis, too.

“The study essentiall­y catalogs a bunch of social ills that emerged after Propositio­n 13’s passage and attempts to tie them to the measure — guilt by chronologi­cal associatio­n, one could say,” CalMatters columnist Dan Walters pointed out. He highlights a telling paragraph from the study, which admits that “we cannot causally connect these patterns to Propositio­n 13.”

We’re reminded of Saturday Night Live comedic character Emily Litella, who would launch into some long tirade before realizing a fundamenta­l error in her premise (Oh, it’s violins, not violence) and then she’d conclude with, “Never mind.”

Higher homeowners­hip rates among white California­ns explain the tax-break disparitie­s. If the institute were serious about boosting equality, it would target housing regulation­s that drive up costs and put homeowners­hip out of reach for California­ns of all background­s.

We can’t improve opportunit­y by raising taxes to fund a government that has plenty of money and can’t figure out how to spend it wisely.

We welcome letters on all issues of public concern. All are subject to editing and condensati­on, and they can be published only with the writer’s true name. Letters must include the writer’s home community and daytime telephone number for verificati­on purposes. Please limit letters to 150words.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States