Daily News (Los Angeles)

Senate Democrats' plan to fix California budget deficit closely follows Newsom's lead

- By Andrew Sheeler The Sacramento Bee

California Senate Democrats last week unveiled their plan to take early action to address the state's towering budget deficit.

The caucus is calling the “Shrink the Shortfall” plan the first step of an ongoing process to address a budget which is between $38 billion and $73 billion in the hole.

“The quicker we move, the quicker we'll be able to reduce the deficit, and we know we have to move decisively because the budget shortfall is real and serious,” Senate President pro Tem Mike McGuire, D-North Coast, said in a statement.

This marks McGuire's first budget as leader of the Senate Democratic Caucus, and Sen. Scott Wiener's first as chair of the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee.

In a statement, Wiener said that the second step of the budget strategy will be unveiled his spring, likely after Gov. Gavin Newsom unveils his revised budget in May.

After the May revision, also known as the May Revise, is released, the Assembly and Senate will have to work together to hash out a budget for Newsom to sign no later than June 15, the constituti­onally set deadline for lawmakers to approve a budget.

Here are some things to know about the proposal:

Earlier this year, Newsom laid out his proposal to address the deficit, including proposing several cuts and spending deferrals.

The Senate Democrats' plan largely follows the governor's lead, approving most of his proposals.

One exception: Newsom called for a reduction of $413.3 million for the Department of Water Resources and the Wildlife Conservati­on Board for watershed climate resilience. The Senate Dems proposed halving that cut, for a total of $206.7 million.

While the early action plan doesn't erase the entire deficit, it would shave more than $17 billion off of it.

The proposal identified the easier changes to make, while saving the more challengin­g fiscal decisions for later this spring when lawmakers have a more complete budget picture.

The proposal calls fro $1.2 billion in cuts for the 2023-24 fiscal year, and another $2.1 billion in cuts for 2024-25, for a total of $3.3 billion in spending reductions.

It also calls for $4.7 billion in borrowing for those two fiscal years, $3.9 billion in fund shifts, $3.2 billion in delayed funding and $2.1 billion in deferrals, for a total of $17.1 billion in savings.

The Senate Democratic Caucus early action proposal breaks down the savings by the five budget subcommitt­ees.

The greatest spending reductions will be made by the subcommitt­ee that deals with public safety, transporta­tion and labor. That subcommitt­ee will oversee a spending reduction of more $5.8 billion, including $1 billion in cuts.

Among the cuts being proposed are $762 million in reductions associated with vacant job positions in various department­s.

The remaining subcommitt­ees handle education, resources and energy, health and human services, and general government.

The education subcommitt­ee will see $1.8 billion in spending reductions, while the resources and energy subcommitt­ee will see $3.7 billion in cuts. The health and human services subcommitt­ee will see $4.8 billion and the general government subcommitt­ee will see $720 million.

While the Senate Democrats' plan addresses part of the shortfall, Newsom's plan to draw down about nearly half of the state's reserves would make up another part of the deficit.

If the “Shrink the Shortfall” solutions are adopted, and Newsom uses about $12.2 billion from the state Rainy Day Fund, Senate Democrats estimate the remaining deficit to be anywhere from $8.6 billion to $23.6 billion.

“This is a reasonable proposal, as it leaves roughly $13 billion remaining in the fund to assist the budget in 202526 or later. This proposal ensures that the Rainy Day Fund will last through at least three years of this downturn — from 2023-24 through at least 202526 — which is a much more responsibl­e approach then depleting the fund in one budget cycle,” according to the budget proposal.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States