Daily Press

Williamsbu­rg monument to be moved

- By David Macaulay Correspond­ent and Alex Perry Staff writer David Macaulay, maccaz17@hotmail.com Alex Perry, 757-285-9397, alexander.perry @virginiame­dia.com

Williamsbu­rg’s controvers­ial Confederat­e war memorial has been frequently moved over more than a century in the city. Now it is to be taken away from a public park after a historic vote by the City Council.

The unanimous vote came amid the concerns expressed by one council member that the 20-foot tall monument in Bicentenni­al Park is incompatib­le with the values held by the city. The vote followed a passionate public hearing Tuesday in which more than 30 speakers expressed a wide range of opinions.

However, the memorial’s removal may not be imminent because the United Daughters of the Confederac­y has until Jan. 31, 2021, to take full ownership of it.

The memorial will be the latest Confederat­e monument to be removed from a public location in Virginia after Black Lives Matter protests swept the nation in the wake of the killing of George Floyd by a white police officer in Minneapoli­s on May 25.

The monument was erected in 1908 by the United Daughters of the Confederac­y and is dedicated to Williamsbu­rg and James City County’s Confederat­e soldiers and sailors. It features Confederat­e flags in its stonework. Although it was recently daubed with a BLM slogan it has escaped the widespread destructio­n of monuments in locations such as Richmond and Portsmouth.

Williamsbu­rg City Council held a special meeting to decide the monument’s fate after Gov. Ralph Northam signed a bill earlier this year allowing localities to remove, relocate or add context to Confederat­e monuments starting July 1. City Council members backed a staff recommenda­tion supporting the removal of the monument at the earliest possible date, allowing for the UDC to take possession and relocate the monument by Jan. 31, 2021. If the UDC fails to take possession of the monument, the city will consider the monument “abandoned” and dispose of it. The council authorized City Manager Andrew Trivette to pay a reasonable cost to move the monument to storage and then a location identified by the UDC.

City attorney Christina Shelton outlined the history of the monument. In 1905, the UDC started raising funds to build the monument. Both Williamsbu­rg City Council and James City Council Board of Supervisor­s donated $500. The UDC raised another $500 form private donations.

The City Council authorized the building of the monument on Palace Green and it was erected in 1908. It remained there until 1932. When Palace Green was sold to the Williamsbu­rg Holding Co., the monument was moved to the courthouse property on South England Street where it remained from 1932 to 1969. When the courthouse was moved to Court Street in 1969 the monument was moved to the new courthouse property. When the courthouse moved again in 1999 to Monticello Avenue, the monument remained on Court Street, which was then later bought by the Colonial Williamsbu­rg Foundation. The

UDC then requested the monument be moved to Bicentenni­al Park. Its request was approved by the City Council on May 11, 2000. The monument has stood in Bicentenni­al Park since then.

Trivette said since advertisin­g the public hearing, the city received a request from UDC to take possession of the monument.

”They have asked the city to consider providing some cost to help them with the removal and the replacemen­t of the monument at a different location,” he said.

City Council member Caleb Rogers said it was strange that the statue was dedicated 40 years after the Civil War ended.

“This, in accordance with the Jim Crow laws of the day, speak toward how I see the statute — that it does not hold the same values that we should in the city of Williamsbu­rg,” he said.

He said the statue was erected after a Virginia constituti­on that establishe­d segregated schools, poll taxes and literacy tests that “directly targeted Black men and women.”

Vice Mayor Pat Dent said removal of the statue from Bicentenni­al Park was an important “step in eliminatin­g divisivene­ss.”

Mayor Doug Pons said there was no place for the Confederat­e monument on public property. However, he recognized that the UDC jointly owned the monument and has a legal right to take it, as well as to mourn family members who died in the Civil War.

Council member Ted Maslin quoted Confederat­e Gen. Robert E. Lee’s opposition to monuments in the era of reconstruc­tion after the war.

“Robert E. Lee feared that these reminders of the past would preserve fierce passions for the future. Such emotions threatened his vision for a speedy reconcilia­tion,” he said.

More than 40 people attended the public hearing Tuesday. COVID-19-related social distancing rules meant many of them were housed in a separate room at the Stryker Center.

Speakers included Corwin Hammond, an African American man whose grandmothe­r told him as a child that Confederat­e monuments were “erected to intimidate us, to always remind us we need to stay in place.”

“To the African American, everything Confederat­e is a reminder of a painful past,” he said. “It’s painful to get up every morning and be reminded that you live in a country that really does not regard you as human.”

Some speakers argued the monument marks the deaths of soldiers and compared it to a gravesite.

Hugh Newton spoke of two great-grandfathe­rs from Williamsbu­rg who fought for the Confederat­e side during the Civil War. He argued for the monument to be contextual­ized and retained by the UDC.

“It’s not a monument of some general on a horse with a sword. It’s meant to honor the men and women who served,” he said.

Nick Belluzzo spoke on behalf of a group of graduate students at the College of William & Mary’s Department of American Studies, Anthropolo­gy and History. He said Confederat­e monuments spoke to “the history of the rise of Jim Crow, of discrimina­tion and exclusion not only from politics but the control of public spaces in which these monuments reside.”

Belluzzo expressed opposition to the city paying for the removal of the monument and said the UDC should foot the bill for the removal of the monument.

“If the UDC is to take possession they should fully fund the removal themselves,” he said.

Gerry Waring of the UDC spoke in defense of the monument.

“We feel a responsibi­lity to not erase the memory of the soldiers and sailors of the Battle of Williamsbu­rg and surroundin­g areas,” she said.

Other speakers argued for the reinterpre­tation of the monument in Bicentenni­al Park with new inscriptio­ns.

 ?? ROBERT BRAUCHLE/STAFF FILE ?? The war monument’s removal may not be imminent because the United Daughters of the Confederac­y has until Jan. 31, 2021, to take full ownership of it.
ROBERT BRAUCHLE/STAFF FILE The war monument’s removal may not be imminent because the United Daughters of the Confederac­y has until Jan. 31, 2021, to take full ownership of it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States