Daily Press

The Philly scapegoat

Wentz got a raw deal with the mess that is the Eagles

- By David Murphy

I’ve come to believe that, a generation from now, psychologi­sts will look back on the year 2020 and conclude that our entire society was clinically insane. So it doesn’t surprise me that most of the Carson Wentz takes I’ve read seem divorced from objective reality.

The disconnect is best illustrate­d by an infographi­c that you’ve probably seen floating around the contentsph­ere. In one column are Wentz’s statistics in his first four seasons in the league. In the second column are his statistics from this season. Above the table is a headline that, depending on the source, has some iteration of the phrase, “What happened to Carson Wentz?”

The amusing part of this breakdown is that it usually begins with the number of games in each sample. There, in the first row of the table, just below the headline that wonders how the heck a quarterbac­k can instantly transform from a perennial Top 10 performer into one of the lowest-rated passers in the league, are the following numbers:

2016-19: 56 games

2020: 12 games

Golly, the answer to the question feels like it is this close, doesn’t it? Can’t quite put my finger on it. Anyway, here’s a look at Wentz’s salary cap hit for next season! LOL!

I’m not a trained mathematic­ian, but

I do know that if somebody tasked me with predicting the future behavior of some entity, and if the only available evidence of that entity’s past behavior were two conflictin­g datasets, the first thing I would do is look at the size of those datasets. And if one of those datasets happened to be five times larger than the other, I would at least hesitate before concluding that the smaller dataset was the better predictor of the future.

Look, if the month of June ended with five straight days of rain, you’d pack an umbrella, not build an ark. That is where we are with Wentz. Can we rule out the possibilit­y that Wentz’s struggles will prove to be biblical? Of course not. Is there a chance that the hit that knocked him out of last year’s Wild Card game will prove to have been one hit too many? Sure. But it’s hard to conclude that is likely to be the case.

Take, for instance, the small handful of me-against-the-world performanc­es we’ve seen Wentz deliver this season. Consider also the 28 consecutiv­e regular-season games that he has started. Both offer plenty of reason to believe that his problems are not physiologi­cal. Besides, nobody has a closer view of Wentz, or more informatio­n about his health, than Doug Pederson. It is notable, then, that Pederson continued to run Wentz back out there as long as he did.

If you were responsibl­e for deciding how to proceed with Wentz from your armchair, the only reasonable course of action would be to assume that Wentz’s bad season is exactly that. One bad season. The only reason he looks existentia­lly bad is that the Eagles are an existentia­l mess around him. The guy has been sacked 50 times. He’s been crushed on countless other occasions. Often, when it looks like he is holding the ball too long, it’s because there are seven guys blocking for him and three receivers blanketed down field. And he still ends up getting crushed.

As Jason Kelce noted earlier this week, the Eagles are not your average bad football team. They are dysfunctio­nal. You could design the best quarterbac­k in the world, and if you forced him to play 7-on-11, he’d look like the worst quarterbac­k in the world. The Eagles might be playing 11-on-11, but the logic stands. Every quarterbac­k’s competence is at least partially dependent on his supporting cast, and there is a threshold at which the deficienci­es of that supporting cast render him useless. None of that means Wentz would be having a great season if he had more help. But there have been plenty of good quarterbac­ks who have had not-good seasons.

Take Ben Roethlisbe­rger. In his fifth year in the league, the future Hall of Famer threw 15 intercepti­ons on 469 attempts, fumbled 14 times, completed 59.9% of his passes, and finished with a Total QBR that was four points lower than Wentz’s this season. Sure, he was two biological years younger than Wentz. But he has gone on to play 12 more seasons and counting. The biggest difference between Roethlisbe­rger’s fifth season and Wentz’s is the Steelers had the NFL’s top-ranked defense, rushed the ball 29 times per game, went 12-4, and won the Super Bowl.

 ?? AP ?? No matter how poorly Carson Wentz has played this season, too much is being made about his struggles via a small sample.
AP No matter how poorly Carson Wentz has played this season, too much is being made about his struggles via a small sample.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States