Dems still not getting the message
Party must talk to voters on simpler level, some say
When Republicans lost big in the 2012 election, the party commissioned a postmortem analysis that arrived at a blunt conclusion about the way it communicated: “The Republican Party needs to stop talking to itself,” said the report, informally known as “the autopsy.”
After the elections last week, in which Democrats across the country lost races they expected to win or narrowly escaped defeat, some are asking whether the Democratic Party is suffering from a similar problem of insularity in its messaging.
Critics and some prominent liberals like Ruy Teixeira, a left-of-center political scientist, have argued that Democrats are trying to explain major issues — such as inflation, crime and school curriculum — with answers that satisfy the party’s progressive base but are unpersuasive and off-putting to most other voters.
The clearest example is in Virginia, where the Democratic candidate for governor, Terry McAuliffe, lost after spending weeks trying to discredit his opponent’s criticisms of public school education, particularly the way that racism is talked about. McAuliffe accused the Republican, Glenn Youngkin, of campaigning on a “made-up” issue and of blowing a “racist dog whistle.”
But a quarter of Virginia voters said the debate over critical race theory, a graduate-level academic framework that has become a stand-in for a debate over what to teach about racism in schools, was the key factor in their decision, and 72% of those voters cast ballots for Youngkin, according to a survey of more than 2,500 voters conducted for The Associated Press by NORC at the University of Chicago, a nonpartisan research organization.
The nuances of critical race theory, which focuses on the ways that institutions perpetuate racism, and the hyperbolic tone of the coverage of the issue in conservative news media point to why Democrats have struggled to come up with an effective response.
Teixeira calls the Democrats’ problem with critical race theory and other galvanizing issues the “Fox News Fallacy.”
These issues are ripe for distortions and exaggeration by Republican politicians and their allies in the news media.
But Teixeira says Democrats should not dismiss voters’ concerns as simply right-wing misinformation.
“An issue is not necessarily completely invalid just because Fox News mentions it,” he said.
In an interview, Teixeira said his logic applied to questions far beyond critical race theory.
“I can’t tell you how many times I analyze a particular issue, saying this is a real concern,” he said. “And the first thing I hear is, ‘Hey, this is a right-wing talking point. You’re playing into the hands of the enemy.’ ”
Fox News is not the only institution capable of producing this kind of reaction from some on the left — it was just the one Teixeira chose to make his point as vividly as possible.
The conservative news media is full of stories that can make it sound as if the country is living through a nightmare.
Rising prices and supply chain difficulties are cast as economic threats on par with the “stagflation” crisis of the 1970s, a comparison that is oversimplified because neither inflation nor unemployment is as high now. Stories of violent crime in large cities are given prominent placement and frequent airing; the same is true of coverage about the record number of migrants being apprehended at the southern border.
The Biden administration has struggled to address concerns about all these issues. Critics pounced when the White House chief of staff, Ron Klain, posted a tweet that cast inflation and supply chain disruptions as “high class problems,” seeming to dismiss the anxiety that many say they have about their own finances.
And despite border crossings hitting the highest number on record since at least 1960, when the government began tracking them, the Biden administration has resisted referring to the issue as a “crisis.”
Then there’s crime. After a year and a half of calls from the progressive left for drastic policing reform, voters across the country last week rejected candidates and policies aligned with the “defund the police” movement.
In two of the most striking examples, Minneapolis voters said no to a referendum to dismantle their city’s troubled police department. And New Yorkers elected as mayor a former police captain, Eric Adams, who strongly opposes “defund” efforts.
One liberal who apparently recognized the broader problems that Democrats have had explaining their platforms to voters was Maya Wiley, who ran against Adams in the mayoral primary as a proponent of sweeping police reforms. In an opinion essay for The New Republic this week, Wiley, a civil rights lawyer, wrote that while Republicans distorted the debate over critical race theory in Virginia, they also offered a more compelling message on education.
“If you only heard evening news sound bites, you would think all he talked about on the campaign trail was critical race theory,” Wiley said of Youngkin. “Not so. In fact, he sounded like a moderate Democrat, with the notable exception of CRT.”
Despite the dog whistling, Wiley said, the message was effective because it was empathetic. “He was saying he understood their pain,” she said.