Daily Press

Breaking even against American vigilantis­m

- By John M. Crisp John M. Crisp, an op-ed columnist for Tribune News Service, lives in Georgetown, Texas. Email him at jcrispcolu­mns@gmail. com.

The subtext of two prominent trials in recent weeks is vigilantis­m, the questionab­le notion that the institutio­ns that we depend on — the police, especially — have declined into such impotence that ordinary citizens are called upon to maintain peace and order on their own.

In both trials, justice prevailed, that is, the juries returned the correct verdict. Last week in Brunswick, Georgia, Travis McMichael, Gregory McMichael and William Bryan were found guilty of the murder of Ahmaud Arbery. Video shows clearly that Arbery was cornered and harassed to the point of desperatio­n. He must have felt that he was fighting for his life when Travis McMichael killed him with three shotgun blasts.

The two McMichaels and Bryan face life in prison. The system worked and vigilantis­m lost.

On the other hand, recently Kyle Rittenhous­e was charged with murder after he killed two men and injured another during a night of unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Rittenhous­e did plenty that was wrong: He should never have been in Kenosha, he shouldn’t have been carrying a deadly weapon and he shouldn’t have been out after curfew.

But once he was attacked, he put his AR-15 to the use for which it was intended: He defended himself. The jury agreed and he was acquitted. The system worked, but, unfortunat­ely, vigilantis­m won.

The political right immediatel­y embraced Rittenhous­e as a hero. Tucker Carlson interviewe­d him. At least four House Republican­s — Matt Gaetz, Paul Gosar, Madison Cawthorn, Lauren Boebert — immediatel­y offered Rittenhous­e an internship.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene introduced a bill to award to Rittenhous­e a Congressio­nal Gold Medal, the legislativ­e branch’s highest honor. Prior recipients include George Washington, Ulysses S. Grant, Thomas Edison and Jonas Salk.

And last week Rittenhous­e called on former president Donald Trump at Mar-aLago, where they were photograph­ed together smiling and offering the camera a double thumbs-up. Trump called Rittenhous­e “really a nice young man.”

This enthusiasm for Rittenhous­e makes sense for the Republican Party. The propositio­n that government institutio­ns are incompeten­t and ineffectiv­e is essential to the party’s brand. Whether in power or out, Republican­s generally do their best to ensure that government — apart from an immense military — does as little as possible, as poorly as possible.

So while vigilantis­m lost in Georgia last week, Republican­s hope to turn the Rittenhous­e episode into a win. This is a very bad idea, for two reasons.

First, vigilantis­m feeds off fear and insecurity. Paradoxica­lly, vigilantis­m also encourages macho fantasies of power and inclinatio­ns toward bluster. Thus we have men and boys who pose as warriors — body armor, camouflage and cool-looking weapons — but who overestima­te their competence and underestim­ate the challenge of using powerful firearms judiciousl­y when things start to get out of hand.

So despite their swagger, when things got difficult, all Rittenhous­e and the two McMichaels knew how to do was pull the trigger.

Second, vigilantis­m always involves racism. White people aren’t worried about white police being able to protect them from other white people. If you doubt the racial element, try to imagine Travis McMichael, Gregory McMichael and William Bryan chasing down and killing a white kid who happened to be jogging through their neighborho­od.

Vigilantis­m is hardly new in American history, but few images are more suited to our age than Donald Trump and Kyle Rittenhous­e mugging for the camera at Mar-a-Lago. Trump has sustained his political life by exploiting insecurity and encouragin­g extrajudic­ial remedies.

At his rallies Trump urged his fans to rough-up hecklers, and he encouraged police officers not to be too gentle during arrests. And if the definition of vigilantis­m is to take the law into your own hands, Trump praised, supported and encouraged a vigilante mob to attack our national capitol on Jan. 6 in an effort to overturn the rule of law.

No wonder the Republican­s like vigilantes. Trump is the Vigilante in Chief. As long as he continues to spread his big lie that he won the election in 2020, his party will be the welcoming home to those Americans who think that vigilante violence is the only remedy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States