Daily Press

Eyes in the sky spot polluters

Camera-equipped drones help environmen­talists find Clean Water Act violations

- By Michael Phillis and Julio Cortez

POOLESVILL­E, Md. — When environmen­talist Brent Walls saw a milky-white substance in a stream flowing through a rural stretch of central Pennsylvan­ia, he suspected the nearby rock mine was violating the law.

Recent rains had filled the ponds at the mine that allow sediment to settle out of the water, but Walls couldn’t easily take a look because they were surrounded by private property. To quickly investigat­e and avoid trespassin­g, Walls captured images of the area with his drone.

“That’s when I found the illicit discharge,” he said. The photo of cloudy liquid provided evidence Walls used to accuse Specialty Granules LLC of violating the Clean Water Act.

Fifty years after that landmark legislatio­n was signed into law, drones are giving environmen­talists a new tool to capture wrongdoing where it is hard to see or expensive to find, though their use to investigat­e polluters is still pretty rare, Walls said.

He would like them used more often. With the help of a grant, he trains drone pilots for the Waterkeepe­r Alliance, a global network of clean water groups. The nonprofit wants activists to know how to use the technology for storytelli­ng and to collect evidence that companies are polluting rivers and streams.

The Clean Water Act allows individual­s — not just federal officials — to enforce the law. But citizens who want to use drones to collect evidence must have a federallyi­ssued pilot’s certificat­e and navigate layers of federal, state and local rules.

Walls is the Upper Potomac Riverkeepe­r and part of a riverkeepe­r network that has used drones in a handful of other instances to collect evidence of pollution and threaten lawsuits if they aren’t satisfied with how companies respond to allegation­s. Drones were used, for example, to investigat­e a West Virginia coal operation that allegedly discharged coal residue into a nearby river. Walls said drone footage helped push the company to clean up the site.

Technologi­cal advances have helped expand the drone market. Miriam McNabb, editor-in-chief of the trade publicatio­n

Dronelife, said drones are now easier to fly, capture better images and can be programmed to automatica­lly conduct surveys and track changes over time.

After Walls presented Specialty Granules with his allegation­s in 2019, the company stopped discharges through the pipe the drone had identified and installed a filtration system that improved water quality.

Matthew McClure, vice president of operations at Specialty Granules, said in a statement that the drone images helped identify the discharge of nontoxic stormwater and that the company uses drones in its own operations. But McClure didn’t welcome the surprise inspection.

“Unschedule­d drone overflies can present a distractio­n and potential accidents to employees who operate heavy machinery,” McClure said.

The ubiquity of drones that shoot video has also triggered privacy concerns. Cam Ward, a former Alabama state senator who is now director of the Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles, sponsored a bill in 2020 to curtail drone use over “critical infrastruc­ture,” a term that included mines, refineries, pipelines and natural gas plants.

“There has to be some expectatio­n of privacy,” he said.

 ?? JULIO CORTEZ/AP ?? Brent Walls of the Potomac Riverkeepe­r Network, left, teaches Robby Lewis-Nash, a staff writer for the environmen­tal group Friends of Casco Bay in Portland, Maine, how to catch an airborne drone during a June 7 training session in Poolesvill­e, Maryland.
JULIO CORTEZ/AP Brent Walls of the Potomac Riverkeepe­r Network, left, teaches Robby Lewis-Nash, a staff writer for the environmen­tal group Friends of Casco Bay in Portland, Maine, how to catch an airborne drone during a June 7 training session in Poolesvill­e, Maryland.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States