Daily Press

‘Woke’ military? Remember the race relations that got us here.

- By Clarence Page Clarence Page is a member of the Chicago Tribune editorial board. Email him at cpage@chicagotri­bune.com.

Recent Republican moves to limit diversity training and transgende­r rights and other hot-button controvers­ies stemming from the annual defense authorizat­ion bill remind me of my own days in uniform back when some of those diversity policies were being created.

Lucky me, I was drafted in 1969, a dark time that some military officials called the “time of troubles” in the late 1960s and early ’70s. It was a time when the armed forces were facing military defeat in Vietnam and racial strife, poor morale and reports of urban riots back home, where the war had grown increasing­ly unpopular — and not just among radical activists.

In just two years, 1969 and 1971, the Defense Department recorded more than 300 racial incidents, including “race riots” and other unrest on military bases and other outposts, including two Navy aircraft carriers, according to military reports

Among other problems, one study found, Black service members were more likely to be assigned to combat than technical operations and were promoted more slowly — even controllin­g for test score difference­s.

The Defense Department, facing transition to an all-volunteer force, took aggressive steps to improve communicat­ions, including establishi­ng “equal opportunit­y councils” in major units and goals and timetables for affirmativ­e action, military-style.

By the first Gulf War in 1991, led by a black general, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Colin Powell, the era of such racial incidents appeared to have passed as the military faced newer challenges, such as the Tailhook scandal, sparked by shocking allegation­s of sexual harassment.

A foremost study by the late Charles Moskos, a Northweste­rn University sociology professor, and then-sociology professor John Sibley Butler of the University of Texas — “All That We Can Be: Black Leadership and Racial Integratio­n the Army Way” — described a new military that, as Moskos put it in an interview with me, became the nation’s most integrated institutio­n. “The only place in America where Blacks routinely boss whites around,” he called it.

As a formerly enlisted African American from a family with lots of cousins in the Army and Air Force, I could not disagree with his assessment.

Now, as I see today’s generation of congressio­nal Republican­s wage their seemingly endless war against the “woke,” I cannot help but wonder: Do these folks have any idea of how turbulent the issue of military diversity used to be?

The House Armed Services Committee last week debated the possible blocking of DEI, a shorthand for programs to encourage “diversity, equity and inclusion,” and the purging of “critical race theory,” an academic field of study whose title increasing­ly seems to be used by conservati­ves to mean whatever they want it to mean in order to gain the most leverage.

Meanwhile, over on the Senate side, U.S. Sen. Tommy Tuberville, a first-term Alabama Republican, continued his monthslong blockade of military promotions, all to protest the Biden administra­tion’s decision to provide military personnel with access to abortion care after the Supreme Court overturned federal abortion rights.

Whatever you may feel about abortion rights, it is a violation of simple fairness to hold military promotions hostage to politics, especially when you’re violating a promise to support our troops and their families in their service to our country.

Butler has his own criticism of some DEI policies, especially when they go too far. He has a point when policies to improve race or gender relations go overboard and actually discourage the free discussion and debate necessary to honest debate. But the best answer is not to put a blackout on such sensitive topics, declaring them off-limits through a conservati­ve version of political correctnes­s.

Besides authorizin­g nearly $886 billion for the nation’s defense and a 5% pay raise for our troops and the Pentagon’s civilian workforce, the National Defense Authorizat­ion Act also would expand employment opportunit­ies for military spouses, funding for child care and improved military housing.

Times have changed. We have become accustomed to Democrats stereotypi­cally calling for cuts in defense spending while Republican­s seem to throw open the doors to the Treasury. But, after all the political hoopla between the two sides, there comes a time for good Americans to put partisan divisions aside — in service to our country.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States