Daily Racing Form National Digital Edition

Keeneland handle down 8.7 percent

- By Matt Hegarty

LEXINGTON, Ky. – Total handle on Keeneland’s races during the track’s 17-day fall meet was down 8.7 percent compared with wagering during the fall meet last year, according to figures provided by the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, a decline that strongly suggested the track’s betting figures suffered from calls to boycott the track because of its recent decision to raise its takeout rates.

The decline, which was most stark on weekends, occurred despite overall handle gains on races at competing tracks during the same time period, a trend that was especially evident when the wagering data was broken down to per-race numbers. That contradict­ion appeared to give credence to the theory that betting money flowed from Keeneland to competing tracks during the fall meet.

At the same time, the declines were not uniform on a day-to-day basis, with wagering down the most on a bad-weather Sunday early in the meet and on three of the meet’s four Saturday cards. In total, handle was down $8.57 million on those four cards, or nearly 75 percent of the total $11.51 million overall decline. Total handle during the meet dropped to $121.43 million, compared with $132.94 million last year, according to the KHRC figures.

While the $121.43 million figure was similar to the total handle for the 2015 fall meet (not including handle on the two-day Breeders’ Cup event) and down $4.7 million from the 2014 meet, the wagering total this year was well off the 2013 and 2012 meets, when handle during the fall meet exceeded $140 million each year. Handle dropped significan­tly in 2014 from the 2013 number. Keeneland ripped out its artificial track in the summer of 2014 and went back to dirt for the main surface.

Wagering was down on nine individual days of the fall meet this year, with wagering up on six of the dates, including one card in which Keeneland put on an additional race compared to the same date last year. Wagering on another date, one of the Saturdays, was statistica­lly even with handle last year.

Bob Elliston, Keeneland’s vice president of sales and racing, did not return a phone call on Monday. In a statement accompanyi­ng the close of the fall meet, Elliston said that the total handle figures were “solid results” and contended that the bad-weather days and the move of eight races from the turf to the main track contribute­d to the declines.

“Those factors adversely impacted field size and therefore overall wagering particular­ly compared to last fall, when we enjoyed perfect weather every race day,” Elliston said.

Field size at the fall meet this year was 9.2 horses per race, up slightly compared to average field size of 9.1 horses per race last fall. On-track numbers also remained strong during the meet, with total attendance just shy of the record set last year and average on-track handle down 1.1 percent.

Purses were also a record this year, up 3.3 percent, to an average of $698,036 a day. Keeneland has raised purses every year for the past five years, and track officials said that the takeout increase was implemente­d in part to bolster the purse account.

While Keeneland was struggling to maintain its handle numbers, other major racetracks had solid Octobers. According to data collected by racing consultant Chris Rossi, who was briefly employed as a consultant for TimeformUS after Daily Racing Form bought the company earlier this year, handle throughout the industry during the Keeneland meet was up 5.5 percent compared with the same period last year, not including Keeneland’s races, with perrace handle up 10.7 percent. The data was collected from Equibase charts.

Santa Anita Park in Southern California reported that handle during its 19-day autumn meet was up 8 percent, while handle at Belmont Park in New York during the track’s fall meet was up 3.7 percent, with per-race handle up 11.6 percent, according to data collected by Rossi.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States