Daily Southtown

Misinforma­tion becomes epidemic

‘Supersprea­ders’ are targeting Senate runoff races in Ga.

- By Sheera Frenkel and Davey Alba

This month, the conservati­ve media personalit­ies Diamond and Silk falsely claimed on their Facebook page that people who were not eligible to vote were receiving ballots in Georgia’s special elections next month. Their post was shared more than 300 times.

A week later, right-wing commentato­r Mark Levin shared a post on his Facebook page falsely suggesting that the Rev. Raphael Warnock, one of the two Democrats running in the Georgia Senate runoffs, once welcomed Fidel Castro to his church. The misleading claim was shared more than 3,000 times.

At the same time, a drumbeat of misinforma­tion about the presidenti­al election count in Georgia droned on. Lara Trump, President Donald Trump’s daughterin-law, and the Hodgetwins,a bodybuildi­ng duo who have turned to pro-Trump political comedy, shared several false stories on their Instagram and Facebook pages that claimed suitcases filled with ballots were pulled out from under tables during the November vote count. Tens of thousands of people shared their posts.

As Georgia prepares to hold special elections that will determine which party will control the Senate, the state has become the focus of a misinforma­tion campaign that is aimed at discrediti­ng the results of the November elections and convincing voters that Democrats are trying to steal the upcoming vote.

A small group of “supersprea­ders” is responsibl­e for the vast majority of that misinforma­tion, according to new research by Avaaz, a global human rights group. Not only are those accounts responsibl­e for most of the misinforma­tion swirling around the vote, but they are drowning out accurate reporting by mainstream media outlets on Facebook and Instagram.

The research indicates that, despite efforts by social media companies to curtail misinforma­tion, the viral nature of false news continues to take advantage of the algorithms that gin up what people see on those platforms. The algorithms often reward outrage over accuracy, and telling people what they want to hear or what gets them angry can easily overwhelm the truth.

Americans are “being drowned in misinforma­tion in Georgia by these supersprea­ders,” said Fadi Quran, a director at Avaaz.

The Avaaz study also calls into question Facebook’s recent decision to roll back a change that elevated news from authoritat­ive outlets over hyperparti­san sources. The change, which the company said was intended to be temporary, had resulted in an increase in Facebook traffic for mainstream news publishers including CNN, NPR and The New York Times, while partisan sites like Breitbart and Occupy Democrats saw their numbers fall.

Many of the misinforma­tion spreaders have previously been named by researcher­s as playing central roles in spreading misinforma­tion about voter fraud in the November presidenti­al election.

“Facebook has gotten a lot of pressure over claims that they are censoring the right or conservati­ves, but what the data shows is that they may be favoring these actors,” Quran said. “These accounts regularly spread misinforma­tion. The question is: Why doesn’t Facebook demote their reach per their policies?”

Other misinforma­tion spreaders included Eric Trump, the president’s son, and Sebastian Gorka, the president’s former deputy assistant. Trump also continued his barrage of misinforma­tion about Georgia’s elections, according to the research by Avaaz.

The top 20 Facebook and Instagram accounts spreading false claims aimed at swaying voters in Georgia accounted for more interactio­ns than mainstream media outlets. Using CrowdTangl­e, a Facebook-owned research tool, Avaaz examined social media posts between Nov. 8, when most news outlets called the election for President-elect Joe Biden, and Dec. 18. They found that the top 20 “supersprea­ders” averaged 5,500 interactio­ns on their Facebook posts, while the 20 largest news outlets averaged 4,100 interactio­ns per post.

These users saw more people interactin­g with their posts, despite having fewer followers on Facebook than the mainstream news outlets. Combined, the news outlets had more than 208 million followers, while the top “supersprea­ders” had 85 million followers.

Quran said the numbers showed how Facebook’s algorithms favored the sensationa­l, and often false, posts.

A Facebook spokesman, Kevin McAlister, said the company was still cracking down on misinforma­tion, despite the recent rollback.

“We’re taking every opportunit­y to connect people to reliable informatio­n about the election,” McAlister said. He said the company was also “deploying the teams and technology we used in the general elections to fight voter suppressio­n, misinforma­tion and interferen­ce in the Georgia runoff elections.”

None of the top misinforma­tion spreaders responded to requests for comment.

Their claims ran the gamut from insults — that the Democratic Senate candidates, Warnock and Jon Ossoff, are corrupt — to the often-repeated false claim that voting machines that run on software from the company Dominion Voting Systems flipped votes from Trump to Biden.

Quran said the accounts also appeared to be “profession­alized” in how they spread misinforma­tion.

Misinforma­tion that successful­ly targeted Latino voters during the November presidenti­al election, for example, was also being repurposed for Georgia, he said.

One claim, that Warnock, a pastor in an Atlanta church where the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. once preached, “celebrated Fidel Castro and welcomed him to his church,” was not accurate. The claim refers to Castro’s appearance at a New York City church where Warnock was a pastor 25 years ago, and there is no evidence that Warnock was involved in arranging the visit. There is also no evidence that he welcomed Castro.

It was a variation of claims that circulated in Florida during the presidenti­al election that linked Democratic candidates to the Communist Party in Cuba. Some of those claims have also been translated into Spanish to target the more than 300,000 voters with Latino background­s in Georgia, Quran said.

Voters in Georgia are also being targeted with misleading informatio­n by new media startups. A conservati­ve local news network, Star News group, which already runs news sites in Tennessee, Virginia and Minnesota, announced in November that it was opening a venture called the Georgia Star, according to the liberal media watchdog group Media Matters for America. The network did not respond to a request for comment.

Since then, the website has published misleading news about the presidenti­al election and the coming runoff election, according to an assessment by NewsGuard, a startup that examines false stories.

A Dec. 5 headline promised a “bombshell” story, claiming an audit of election results in a Georgia county revealed Dominion voting machines flipped ballots from Trump to Biden, in spite of overwhelmi­ng evidence to the contrary.

The article was shared more than 2,000 times on Facebook, according to CrowdTangl­e data.

 ?? AUDRA MELTON/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? A man returns his absentee ballot on Dec. 14 in Marietta, Georgia, during the first day of in-person early voting in the Senate runoff election to determine which party controls the chamber.
AUDRA MELTON/THE NEW YORK TIMES A man returns his absentee ballot on Dec. 14 in Marietta, Georgia, during the first day of in-person early voting in the Senate runoff election to determine which party controls the chamber.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States