Daily Southtown

Trump’s presidency has tested the broken windows theory

- Robert B. Reich Distribute­d by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Most of the 74.2 million Americans who voted to reelect Donald Trump —

46.8 percent of the votes cast in the 2020 presidenti­al election — don’t hold Trump accountabl­e for what he’s done to America.

Their acceptance of Trump’s behavior will be his vilest legacy.

Nearly 40 years ago, political scientist James Q. Wilson and criminolog­ist George L. Kelling observed that a broken window left unattended in a community signals that no one cares if windows are broken there. The broken window is thereby an invitation to throw more stones and break more windows. The message: Do whatever you want here because others have done it and got away with it.

The broken windows theory has led to picayune and arbitrary law enforcemen­t in poor communitie­s.

But America’s most privileged and powerful have been breaking big windows with impunity.

In 2008, Wall Street nearly destroyed the economy. Wall Street got bailed out while millions of Americans lost their jobs, savings and homes. Yet no major Wall Street executive ever went to jail.

In more recent years, top executives of Purdue Pharmaceut­icals, along with the members of the Sackler family who own it, knew the dangers of OxyContin but did nothing.

Executives at Wells Fargo Bank pushed bank employees to defraud customers.

Executives at Boeing hid the results of tests showing its 737 Max Jetliner was unsafe.

Police chiefs across America looked the other way as police under their command repeatedly killed innocent Black Americans.

Here, too, they’ve got away with it. These windows remain broken.

Trump has brought impunity to the highest office in the land, wielding a wrecking ball to the most precious windowpane of all — American democracy. The message?

A president can obstruct special counsels’ investigat­ions of his wrongdoing, push foreign officials to dig up dirt on political rivals, fire inspectors general who find corruption, order the executive branch to refuse congressio­nal subpoenas, flood the internet with fake informatio­n about his opponents, refuse to release his tax returns, accuse the press of being “fake media” and “enemies of the people,” and make money off his presidency.

And he can get away with it. Almost half of the electorate will even vote for his reelection.

A president can also lie about the results of an election without a shred of evidence — and yet, according to polls, be believed by the vast majority of those who voted for him.

Trump’s recent pardons have broken double-paned windows.

Not only has he shattered the norm for presidenti­al pardons — usually granted because of a petitioner’s good conduct after conviction and service of sentence — but he’s pardoned people who themselves shattered windows. By pardoning them, he has rendered them unaccounta­ble for their acts.

They include aides convicted of lying to the FBI and threatenin­g potential witnesses in order to protect him; his son-in-law’s father, who pleaded guilty to tax evasion, witness tampering, illegal campaign contributi­ons and lying to the Federal Election Commission; Blackwater security guards convicted of murdering Iraqi civilians, including women and children; Border Patrol agents convicted of assaulting or shooting unarmed suspects; and Republican lawmakers and their aides found guilty of fraud, obstructio­n of justice and campaign finance violations.

It’s not simply the size of the broken window that undermines standards, according to Wilson and Kelling. It’s the willingnes­s of society to look the other way. If no one is held accountabl­e, norms collapse.

Trump may face a barrage of lawsuits when he leaves office, possibly including criminal charges. But it’s unlikely he’ll go to jail. Presidenti­al immunity or a self-pardon will protect him. Prosecutor­ial discretion would almost certainly argue against indictment, in any event. No former president has ever been convicted of a crime. The mere possibilit­y of a criminal trial for Trump would ignite a partisan brawl across the nation.

Congress may try to limit the power of future presidents — strengthen­ing congressio­nal oversight, fortifying the independen­ce of inspectors general, demanding more financial disclosure, increasing penalties on presidenti­al aides who break laws, restrictin­g the pardon process, and so on.

But Congress — a co-equal branch of government under the Constituti­on — cannot rein in rogue presidents. And the courts don’t want to weigh in on political questions.

The appalling reality is that Trump may get away with it. And in getting away with it, he will have changed and degraded the norms governing American presidents. The giant windows he’s broken are invitation­s to a future president to break even more.

Nothing will correct this unless or until an overwhelmi­ng majority of Americans recognize and condemn what has occurred.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States