Daily Southtown

Va. jurors award $10M to Depp in libel lawsuit

But ex-wife receives $2M for defamation over hoax accusation

- By Denise Lavoie

FAIRFAX, Va. — A jury awarded Johnny Depp more than $10 million Wednesday in his libel lawsuit against ex-wife Amber Heard, vindicatin­g his stance that Heard fabricated claims that she was abused by Depp before and during their brief marriage.

The jury also found Heard was defamed by a lawyer for Depp who accused her of creating a detailed hoax that included roughing up their apartment to look worse for police. The jury awarded her $2 million in damages.

The verdicts bring an end to a televised trial that Depp had hoped would help restore his reputation, though it turned into a spectacle of a vicious marriage. Throughout the trial, fans — overwhelmi­ngly on Depp’s side — lined up overnight for coveted courtroom seats. Spectators who couldn’t get in gathered on the street to cheer Depp and jeer Heard whenever they appeared outside.

Heard, who was stoic in the courtroom as the verdict

was read, said she was heartbroke­n.

“I’m even more disappoint­ed with what this verdict means for other women. It’s a setback. It sets back the clock to a time when a woman who spoke up and spoke out could be publicly humiliated. It sets back the idea that violence against women is to be taken seriously,” she said in a statement on her Twitter account.

Depp, who was not in court Wednesday, said “the jury gave me my life back.”

“I hope that my quest to have the truth be told will have helped others, men or women, who have found themselves in my situation, and that those supporting them never give up,” he said in a statement posted to Instagram.

Depp had sued Heard for libel in Fairfax County Circuit Court over a December 2018 op-ed she wrote in The Washington Post describing herself as “a public figure representi­ng domestic abuse.”

His lawyers said he was defamed by the article even though it never mentioned his name.

The jury found in Depp’s favor on all three of his claims relating to specific statements in the 2018 piece.

In evaluating Heard’s countercla­ims, jurors considered three statements by a lawyer for Depp who called her allegation­s a hoax. They found she was defamed by one of them, in which the lawyer claimed that she and friends “spilled a little wine and roughed the place up, got their stories straight,” and called police.

The jury found Depp should receive $10 million in compensato­ry damages and $5 million in punitive damages, but the judge said state law caps punitive damages at $350,000, meaning Depp was awarded $10.35 million.

While the case was ostensibly about libel, most of the testimony focused on whether Heard had been physically and sexually abused, as she claimed. Heard enumerated more than a dozen alleged assaults, including a fight in Australia — where Depp was shooting a “Pirates of the Caribbean” sequel — in which Depp lost the tip of his middle finger and Heard said she was sexually assaulted with a liquor bottle.

Depp said he never hit Heard and that she was the abuser, though Heard’s attorneys highlighte­d yearsold text messages Depp sent apologizin­g to Heard for his behavior as well as profane texts he sent to a friend in which Depp said he wanted to kill Heard and defile her dead body.

In some ways, the trial was a replay of a lawsuit Depp filed in the United Kingdom against a British tabloid after he was described as a “wife beater.” The judge in that case ruled in the newspaper’s favor after finding that Heard was telling the truth in her descriptio­ns of abuse.

In the Virginia case, Depp had to prove not only that he never assaulted Heard, but that Heard’s article — which focused primarily on public policy related to domestic violence — defamed him. He also had to prove that Heard wrote the article with actual malice. And to claim damages he had to prove that her article caused the damage to his reputation as opposed to any number of articles before and after Heard’s piece that detailed the allegation­s against him.

Eric Rose, a crisis management and communicat­ions expert in Los Angeles, said that “from a reputation management perspectiv­e, there can be no winners.”

Depp, a three-time best actor Oscar nominee, had until recent years been a bankable star. Heard’s acting career has been more modest, and her two upcoming roles are in a small film and the “Aquaman” sequel due out next year.

 ?? EVELYN HOCKSTEIN/REUTERS ?? Actor Amber Heard, center, stands with her lawyers Elaine Bredehoft and Benjamin Rottenborn before the verdicts are read in court Wednesday in Fairfax, Va.
EVELYN HOCKSTEIN/REUTERS Actor Amber Heard, center, stands with her lawyers Elaine Bredehoft and Benjamin Rottenborn before the verdicts are read in court Wednesday in Fairfax, Va.
 ?? KEVIN DIETSCH/GETTY ?? Actor Johnny Depp, who was not in court Wednesday, said “the jury gave me my life back.”
KEVIN DIETSCH/GETTY Actor Johnny Depp, who was not in court Wednesday, said “the jury gave me my life back.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States