Daily Times (Primos, PA)

Pa. grapples with new sentences for juvenile lifers

- By Adam Geller

PHILADELPH­IA » On a longago summer night, 16-yearold Giovanni Reid accepted a neighbor’s invitation to an Internatio­nal House of Pancakes restaurant as thanks for watching the man’s infant son.

By sunrise, the outing in south Philadelph­ia had veered to robbery, then murder.

“I had never seen somebody get shot like that right in front of me,” Reid, now 42, said in a telephone interview from prison. “It was a very scary thing to be a part of.”

Nearly 26 years later, Reid — who has long denied a role in the crime, but faults himself for hanging out with an older, fast-running crowd — will soon get the chance to start over. He is one of 517 Pennsylvan­ia offenders sentenced to life without parole for crimes committed as juveniles whose cases are being revisited because of a pair of Supreme Court rulings.

Pennsylvan­ia leads the nation in those serving mandatory no-release sentences for crimes committed as minors, the result of laws that long treated teens charged with the most serious crimes like adults. After the Supreme Court barred such sentences for juveniles in 2012, Pennsylvan­ia officials argued that did not apply to those already in prison.

Then last year the nation’s highest court said the ban must be applied retroactiv­ely, triggering new sentencing hearings and parole for inmates across the country.

In Pennsylvan­ia, judges have resentence­d more than 100 inmates, many now in their 50s and 60s. Reid, who was resentence­d earlier this year and approved for parole in late July, hopes to be released in August.

So far, 58 Pennsylvan­ia inmates have been released, and five have been denied parole. Two inmates were resentence­d to life without parole, allowed by the Supreme Court in rare cases when offenders’ crimes reflect “permanent incorrigib­ility.”

State prison officials and advocates say they are working to prepare inmates for return to a world very different from the one they left behind, pairing them with mentors and psychologi­sts.

“One of the things that makes it a more challengin­g group is that they came in as children,” said John Wetzel, secretary of correction­s.

About 300 of the inmates are in prison for killings in Philadelph­ia, defense attorneys say.

Judges here have fasttracke­d the cases of some of the longest-serving inmates, approving new sentences negotiated by the district attorney’s office and defenders that have made most immediatel­y eligible for parole.

In April, Reid was resentence­d to 25 years to life, making him eligible for release. He is awaiting a decision by the parole board. Reid acknowledg­es being with a group of men and knowing one had a gun when that man shot Robert Janke, 22, a pre-med University of Pennsylvan­ia student. The shooter was convicted of first-degree murder. Reid turned down an offer to plead guilty in exchange for 25 to 50 years in prison, and was convicted of second-degree murder.

Now city courts have begun dealing with the contested cases. A panel of Philadelph­ia judges ruled this spring that they would allow juvenile offenders to be resentence­d to life without parole, but only in rare cases. The state Supreme Court has also set tight boundaries for the case reviews.

In June, the court sided with inmate Qu’eed Batts, who argued that life without parole for juvenile offenders should be all but forbidden. The court said prosecutor­s can only sentence juveniles to no-parole terms in rare circumstan­ces and must first prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they are “irreparabl­y corrupt” and beyond rehabilita­tion.

“It is the exceedingl­y rare and uncommon juvenile whose crime reflects his permanent incorrigib­ility who therefore may be constituti­onally sentenced to life without the possibilit­y of parole,” Justice Christine Donohue wrote on behalf of the court’s majority.

People on both sides said the ruling could effectivel­y eliminate life without parole for juvenile offenders in the state. Others are waiting to see how resentenci­ngs play out in court.

“That is an exceedingl­y high burden,” said one of Batts’ lawyers, Bradley Bridge of the Defender Associatio­n of Philadelph­ia. The associatio­n represents about two-thirds of the city’s juvenile lifers.

Batts was 14 when he shot two other teens in Easton, killing one of them, after a gang superior handed him a gun and mask and told him to “put work in.” He is now 26 and has twice been sentenced to life without parole, but must be resentence­d.

While the prospect of release has given new hope to inmates and their families, it has brought back painful memories for the families of many victims. Robin Kays of Linesville is one of the few who understand­s both sides.

Nearly 40 years ago, her brother and her cousin, both 16, shot her stepfather to death while he slept, in a plot one hatched to reunite his divorced parents. Kays, then 21, recalls joining other family members to clean up the blood. But after years of prison visits with Joseph Frisina and Ricky Battles and watching them mature, she is convinced they should be released. Both were recently resentence­d, with Battles subsequent­ly denied parole. Frisina isn’t yet eligible.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States