Daily Times (Primos, PA)

Federal agency OKs gas pipeline project being fought by residents

- By Mark Gillispie

CLEVELAND » The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has approved constructi­on of a high-pressure pipeline that will carry natural gas from the shale fields of Appalachia, across northern Ohio and into Michigan and Canada, a decision likely to be a death blow for project opponents concerned about safety and property rights.

The planned $2 billion NEXUS Gas Transmissi­on project is a partnershi­p between Calgary, Albertabas­ed Enbridge and Detroit-based DTE Energy. The 255-mile-long pipeline will be capable of carrying 1.5 billion cubic feet of gas per day, enough to meet the needs of about 15,000 homes for a year.

The commission Friday issued a certificat­e of public necessity and convenienc­e, the project’s last major regulatory hurdle.

Despite the opposition, there wasn’t much chance the project wouldn’t be approved as long as the NEXUS partnershi­p was willing to pay for it. The Natural Gas Act of 1938 gives private companies wide latitude to build pipelines in the U.S., and FERC has no known history of disapprovi­ng projects like NEXUS.

“Receiving this stamp of approval is a testament to our strong history of consultati­on and successful project execution,” said NEXUS Gas Transmissi­on President Jim Grech in a statement.

Jon Strong of Medina County’s Guilford Township in northeast Ohio scoffs at the notion that property owners were consulted in any meaningful way. He became one of the leaders of a fight that began with an effort to convince NEXUS and FERC’s staff to move the pipeline south to farmland and away from semi-rural communitie­s like Strong’s and cities like Green in neighborin­g Summit County. Green officials provided detailed plans for alternate routes that both NEXUS and FERC’s staff rejected as having no advantage over company’s preferred route.

A federal lawsuit filed by opponents against FERC over the approval process was dealt a blow earlier this month when a magistrate wrote that U.S. District Court was the wrong venue for their complaint.

Strong’s 11-acre property sits directly in the pipeline’s path. Constructi­on will result in the clearing of a 450-foot-long, 100-foot-wide swath of property. Once the pipeline is buried, he won’t be allowed to plant or build anything on top of a 50-footwide easement the company requires for access to the pipeline. His house is well within the expected 1,500-foot blast zone should a catastroph­ic failure occur.

Strong called the FERC approval process “an elaborate sham.” He said the agency and its staff willfully ignored residents and their concerns.

“It’s a bureaucrat­ic means to a predetermi­ned outcome,” he said.

Strong and others refused to allow NEXUS surveyors onto their property, even when they were accompanie­d by armed sheriff’s deputies. Property owners have no choice now.

What’s left for holdouts is negoti-

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States