Daily Times (Primos, PA)

Ex-Wilmington Trust officials convicted of fraud, conspiracy

- By Randall Chase

WILMINGTON, DEL. » Four former executives for the only financial institutio­n to be criminally charged in connection with the federal bank bailout program were convicted Thursday of fraud and conspiracy charges.

The former Wilmington Trust executives were convicted after a six-week trial in which prosecutor­s said the defendants deliberate­ly misled banking regulators and investors by not reporting hundreds of millions of past due loans.

Former bank president Robert Harra Jr., former chief credit officer William North, former chief financial officer David Gibson and former controller Kevyn Rakowski were convicted on charges of fraud, conspiracy and making false statements to federal regulators.

Several of the offenses carry maximum prison terms of 30 years, but it’s unclear whether any of the four will spend time behind bars. No sentencing date has been set, and defense attorneys vowed to appeal.

This isn’t over yet,” said Ken Breen, an attorney for Gibson.

The bank itself reached a $60 million settlement with prosecutor­s last year just as a trial was set to start. In reaching the settlement, Wilmington Trust did not acknowledg­e any liability.

Prosecutor­s alleged that in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, bank executives misled regulators and investors about Wilmington Trust’s massive amount of past-due commercial real estate loans before the bank was hastily sold in 2011 while bordering on collapse. Founded by members of the DuPont family in 1903, the bank imploded despite receiving $330 million from the federal government’s Program.

“It was the gold standard for many number of years in the state of Delaware, and its demise was a significan­t developmen­t in this community,” said U.S. Attorney David Weiss.

“The defendants were a victim of their own arrogance,” Weiss added.

Weiss said the defendants recklessly loaned money to a small group of developers, mostly for projects in central and southern Delaware, then hid the truth when the loans became past due and weren’t paid.

Instead of reporting the true amount of past due loans, bank officials “waived” millions of dollars in matured loans from reporting requiremen­ts if the loans were designated as “current for interest” and in the process of being extended, even if the necessary paperwork had not been done. Troubled Asset Relief

To ensure that loans that were well past the date for repayment were current for interest and thus purportedl­y exempt from reporting requiremen­ts, the bank lent even more money to struggling developers just so they could make the interest payments on the underlying loans.

“That’s the bank paying itself,” prosecutor Jamie McCall told jurors.

Before the fire sale to M&T Bank, Wilmington Trust raised $287 million in a 2010 stock offering, intended in part to help repay the TARP funds, while concealing the truth about its shaky financial condition from investors, prosecutor­s said.

“The public has an absolute right to know how these financial institutio­ns are keeping score .... The jury understood this,” Weiss said. “They’ve got car loans. They’ve got mortgages. They’ve got credit cards. There are no extensions when your bill comes due, there’s no waiver. You pay it off or the bank comes to see you about what you owe.”

Prosecutor­s said Wilmington Trust officials deliberate­ly concealed the quantity of past due loans on their books from October 2009 through November 2010, failing to disclose the waiver practice to regulators, even after federal officials found serious problems during a 2009 examinatio­n. The examinatio­n resulted in a memorandum of understand­ing in October 2009 requiring the bank, among other obligation­s, to submit past-due loan informatio­n monthly, instead of quarterly.

In the fourth quarter of 2009, Wilmington Trust officials reported only $10.8 million in commercial loans as 90 days or more past due, concealing more than $316 million in past due loans subject to the waiver practice, according to prosecutor­s.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States