Daily Times (Primos, PA)

Contractor spared prison in Upland graft scheme

- By Alex Rose arose@21st-centurymed­ia.com @arosedelco on Twitter

MEDIA COURTHOUSE » The former owner of an Eddystone security system company who paid kickbacks to former Upland Borough Council President Ed Mitchell in exchange for securing no-bid contracts at borough properties was sentenced to 23 months of intermedia­te punishment Thursday.

Thomas Patrick Willard, 62, the former owner of Logan Technology Solutions, was also given

90 days on electronic home monitoring and seven years of consecutiv­e probation, and ordered to pay

$45,762 in restitutio­n to the borough of Upland.

“The reason I’m sentencing you as such is not that I countenanc­e what you did by any means,” Common Pleas Court Judge John Capuzzi said. “What I did take into considerat­ion is your amenabilit­y to rehabilita­tion, the fact that you cooperated fully with the commonweal­th (and) the fact that you brought this to light, to allow the Borough of Upland to purge itself of a cancer.”

Mitchell, 75, of Fourth Street, a Republican, served on council for

17 years, including eight as president until he was replaced by Christine Peterson in 2016.

He was convicted at trial in July on six counts each of theft by deception and restricted activities, 12 counts of criminal conspiracy and 18 counts of bribery, but was acquitted on two charges of intercept communicat­ions. Sentencing for Mitchell is set for today.

Willard entered an open guilty plea to all 82 felony counts against him in July, which included six counts each of theft by unlawful taking, receiving stolen property, theft by deception, theft by failure to make required dispensati­on of funds and restricted activities seeking improper influence.

Willard also pleaded to 18 counts of bribery, two counts of intercept communicat­ions and 32 counts of conspiracy. Many of the charges merged for the purposes of sentencing.

“I’ve been disgraced, I lost my business – not that that makes a difference – but I sincerely apologize for what the court had to go through for all this,” Willard said Thursday.

Willard was arrested and charged along with Mitchell in December 2016 for a long-running scheme in which Mitchell would enter no-bid contracts with Willard’s company to provide equipment to the borough at inflated prices.

“He would make sure that the jobs would go through properly,” said Willard at Mitchell’s trial earlier this year. “We worked out a deal where I would cash the checks and he would get some money from each check from the jobs.”

Willard also testified that he and Mitchell would break work for the same job into smaller invoices so that it would not trigger a bid requiremen­t. The checks were typically cashed at a checkcashi­ng business instead of being deposited into business accounts.

In exchange for securing the work, Willard said he would provide Mitchell with a “thank you” in the form of cash payments, typically 10 to 15 percent of the invoice, but sometimes as high as

20 percent.

“He would say, ‘I’m getting you the work, I would think that you would try and acknowledg­e that I’m doing this for you,’” Willard said at trial.

Willard had also received a

$30,300 payment for police dashboard cameras – broken up into two $15,150 invoices – which he said he never ordered. Willard said he and Mitchell concocted a story that the equipment had been stolen and that Willard should rebill the borough for more than $15,000 in replacemen­t parts. The restitutio­n order was for those payments.

In addition to the kickback scheme, Mitchell was accused of secretly recording fellow council members and others using covert cameras and microphone­s Willard placed in the secretary’s office and council chambers, allegedly at Mitchell’s direction.

Willard’s attorney, Timothy Possenti, noted Willard had been cooperativ­e from the outset of the investigat­ion, testifying at a preliminar­y hearing even before having any agreement in place with the District Attorney’s Office.

That was backed up by Delaware County Detective Timothy Deery, who described Willard Thursday as “a horrible businessma­n” but with some redeemable qualities.

Deery, who had been subpoenaed to appear by Possenti, said he spoke with Willard for about

45 minutes at his home in August

2016 and laid out the case. Willard immediatel­y provided company records and a computer, then engaged in a days-long process of going through records to help investigat­ors put the case together, according to Deery.

Deery said Willard never ducked his calls or dodged tough questions, and agreed to conduct a phone intercept with Mitchell.

Eddystone attorney Konstantin­os Mikropoulo­s and Eddystone VFW Commander Bill Daws also spoke on Willard’s behalf.

Assistant District Attorney Mary Mann had provided the court with sentencing guidelines but could not make any statements at sentencing due to the nature of Willard’s plea.

 ??  ??
 ?? DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA FILE PHOTO ?? Thomas Willard is taken into custody after his arrest in December 2016.
DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA FILE PHOTO Thomas Willard is taken into custody after his arrest in December 2016.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States