Daily Times (Primos, PA)

Chris Freind: Who won, who lost in midterm vote in Delco

- Chris Freind Columnist

And then there were none. Well, almost none.

Pick your descriptor: bloodbath, annihilati­on, massacre. No matter how you slice it, Republican­s in the Philadelph­ia suburbs – one of the critical epicenters of presidenti­al campaigns – got their derrieres kicked in unpreceden­ted fashion.

Most of the attention has been focused on national elections, but the real story is what transpired at the local and regional levels.

We’ve got a lot to cover in this election post-mortem, so let’s get to it.

1) Large percentage­s of Republican delegation­s (state senators and representa­tives) in Delaware and Chester counties were wiped out, including longtime legislator­s such as Sen. John Rafferty. It is a net loss of at least 13 seats, with Bucks County Sen. Tommy Tomlinson holding a 100-vote lead (out of 109,000).

Why the shellackin­g? There is no single answer, as a combinatio­n of factors led to the GOP’s dismal showing. However, in numerous cases where the margins were tight, losses could have, and absolutely should have, been avoided. And it boils down to arrogance and laziness.

Take Representa­tive Alex Charlton of the 165th (former Rep. Billy Adolf’s district). Of 31,000 votes cast, he lost by a mere 154. Sure, it’s easy to blame a polarizing Donald Trump for that defeat, but that would be inaccurate. Truth is, it’s no coincidenc­e that Charlton lost after having little personal interactio­n with his constituen­ts over the course of his term. For many, the last time they saw Alex was two years ago – during his last campaign. Ditto for defeated Sen. Tom McGarrigle, R-26 of Springfiel­d, and damn near all the Republican­s who lost.

Newsflash, guys: there’s a concept called “door-to-door.” It may no longer be in vogue, and it involves effort, but it undeniably works. Here’s the thing, though: you can’t just do it in the run-up to an election. Instead, it needs to be part of the daily routine for the entirety of one’s term. That didn’t happen.

Not long ago, when a new family moved into Delaware County, its members were immediatel­y greeted by local GOP officials with the message that Delco had lower taxes, better schools, and safer streets than places like Democratic Philadelph­ia – and a voter registrati­on card was left behind so that people could become Republican­s if they chose. There was consistent follow-up, and the “Machine” enjoyed immense success.

But now, most pols instead rely on “sophistica­ted” technology programs and “expert” consultant­s to get out the vote (Havertown’s Democratic State representa­tive, Greg Vitali, is a notable exception, as he always pounds the pavement).

Sorry, but Facebook messaging, email blasts, and increasing­ly worthless mailers – virtually all of which hit the trash can in four seconds – cannot replace the inherent value of the personal touch: door-to-door, speaking engagement­s and coffee klatches, and greeting commuters on freezing train platforms at 5 a.m. Newsflash number two: tech is important, but cell phones and computer programs don’t vote. People do.

In allowing technology to supersede retail politickin­g, southeaste­rn Pennsylvan­ia Republican­s made a fatal mistake. After all, in Charlton’s case, he didn’t actually lose by 154, but

77 plus one. Translatio­n: in the

104 weeks that encompasse­d his term, he only had to “win over” less than one voter per week. Door-to-door would undoubtedl­y have accomplish­ed that, and he’d be returning to Harrisburg instead of licking his wounds.

Lesson: the all-important first step for local Republican­s to rebound is getting back to basics.

2) It is absolutely startling how many “die-hard” Republican­s, who despise all-things-Democratic, shot themselves in the foot. Staying with the Charlton race (but applicable to the myriad races with razor-thin margins), there were large numbers of college students attending school outside their home districts who either didn’t vote or, more unforgivab­le, registered in Democratic stronghold­s like Philadelph­ia and Pittsburgh. Sorry, but you can’t have it both ways: blabbering that the Dems need to lose, yet allowing your politicall­y like-minded children to throw away their votes elsewhere.

With little effort, this author thought of at least 30 such examples – meaning the real number is substantia­lly higher. Translatio­n: Those 30 votes constitute­d 20 percent of the total needed for a Charlton victory. Politicall­y active parents bear responsibi­lity for not having properly advised their children, but so too do the campaigns, since none made registerin­g college students at home a priority.

Obviously, the opposite is also true: Democratic students attending college in red states and conservati­ve parts of Pennsylvan­ia are also wasting their votes. Given that the new norm is extremely close elections, every vote takes on unpreceden­ted significan­ce.

Lesson: Nothing trumps a highly organized campaign that executes a smart game plan.

3) The GOP continues to struggle in appealing to those outside its traditiona­l coalition – especially poignant since much of that traditiona­l base is changing, such as college-educated voters. So what must suburban Republican­s do to compete? Three things:

• Personal interactio­n, as discussed.

• Run aspiration­al campaigns that connect with voters, especially targeting immigrants and adult children of immigrants. Once upon a time, immigrants (legal, of course) aligned themselves with the political parties most helpful to fulfilling their American dream. From providing physical and economic security, to laying out the path for each generation to outdo its parents, parties thrived when they genuinely appealed to voters.

For Republican­s to get back in the game, they must reconnect with lost constituen­cies and make inroads with new ones in America’s rapidly changing landscape. That doesn’t mean they should sell out their principles, or abandon their beliefs. Quite the opposite: they need to figure out a fresh way to articulate their ideas with a platform that is, contrary to public perception, inclusive, tolerant and forward-thinking.

Specifical­ly, they should explain how state policies directly impact people’s lives to a far greater degree than anything Mr. Trump or Congress

does. From school choice to lower taxes, and from becoming a right-to-work state that would create a manufactur­ing boom to responsibl­y harnessing the state’s massive natural gas resources, they must argue that the Republican platform will make for a more secure future.

• Advocate detailed solutions to the problems that keep most people (Republican and Democrat alike) awake at night: reining in skyrocketi­ng college tuition; reforming health care on the state level without the need

to repeal Obamacare; curbing trial lawyers so that businesses can thrive without frivolous lawsuits; stopping the brain drain that sees children seeking careers in other states; and protecting kids from the hyper-sensitive political correctnes­s that is robbing them of their innocence.

Lesson: Fail to address those issues, and Pennsylvan­ia will be on its way to becoming the next Illinois – blue, bankrupt, and backwards.

4) Recruiting quality candidates cannot be overestima­ted. Sounds common sense enough, but once again, the Republican­s fielded less-than-stellar candidates. And that’s being kind.

Granted, Gov. Wolf and Sen. Casey are relatively popular figures. Neither set the world on fire with their personalit­ies, but incumbency has its advantages.

That said, Tom Wolf was reelected for two reasons: the Republican-controlled Legislatur­e did virtually nothing over the last four years – nothing. No tough votes. No holding the guv’s feet to the fire by making him veto popular bills. Nothing. So in the absence of such things, there was no impetus to change, and Mr. Wolf came across as the nice, albeit unexciting, guy in the governor’s mansion.

The second reason was that challenger Scott Wagner was

perceived as an arrogant, rich, and even obnoxious – a Donald Trump clone without the charm and charisma. The result was a slaughter that helped seal the fate of all down-ticket Republican­s. Let’s face it: when your top dog is dogging it so badly that it’s a moral victory to crack 40, you’re doomed as a party.

Ditto for former congressma­n Lou Barletta, who ran the worst statewide campaign since Lynn Swann’s “swan song” debacle against former Gov. Ed Rendell. There was no cohesivene­ss, no organizati­on, and no strategy in Barletta’s buffoonery. He should have stayed in Congress. Enough said.

Lesson: Do something right,

or don’t do it at all. In race after race, Dems recruited dynamic women, experience­d business people, former military officers and intel operatives, and dynamic women. The Republican­s recruited, and nominated, the Keystone Kops. We can talk all day about the “Trump” factor, but you’ll never win the race if you don’t have the horses.

The next column will analyze the elections from a national perspectiv­e.

 ??  ??
 ?? PETE BANNAN – DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA ?? Republican campaign signs go out with the trash in Ridley Township on the day after dismal showing by the Delaware County GOP in local elections.
PETE BANNAN – DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA Republican campaign signs go out with the trash in Ridley Township on the day after dismal showing by the Delaware County GOP in local elections.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States