Daily Times (Primos, PA)

Pa. budget fails to deliver help for environmen­t

- By Rep. Greg Vitali Times Guest Columnist State Rep. Greg Vitali, D-Delaware/Montgomery, represents the 166th Legislativ­e District. He can be reached at gvitali@pahouse.net.

Pennsylvan­ia Gov. Tom Wolf recently signed into law a package of budget bills for the commonweal­th’s 2019-20 fiscal year. These bills are reflective of a governor and legislativ­e leaders who do not prioritize environmen­tal protection.

DEP Staffing

Most importantl­y, the budget failed to address the chronic understaff­ing of the Pennsylvan­ia Department of Environmen­t Protection – the state agency charged with enforcing environmen­tal laws. The DEP has suffered almost a 30 percent reduction in staff since 2002, losing more than 900 positions. This understaff­ing has compromise­d its ability to reduce air and water pollution, regulate oil and gas developmen­t, combat climate change, plug abandoned oil and gas wells and protect the Chesapeake Bay.

Environmen­tal Fund Transfers

Consistent with Governor Wolf’s budget proposal in February, money was taken from three important environmen­tal funds to pay for general government­al operations in the upcoming fiscal year.

More than $16 million was taken from the Environmen­tal Stewardshi­p Fund – commonly known as Growing Greener. This fund provides monies for farmland preservati­on, open space protection, abandoned mine reclamatio­n, watershed protection and restoratio­n, water and sewer infrastruc­ture and community parks and recreation­al facilities.

Ten million dollars was taken from the Recycling Fund, which supports municipal recycling programs by helping to pay for recycling trucks, processing equipment, staff salaries, composting programs and consumer education.

Almost $70 million was taken from the Oil and Gas Lease Fund, which was created to finance conservati­on, recreation, dams and flood-control projects. A 2017 Pennsylvan­ia Supreme Court decision prohibits using revenue from this fund for any purpose other than conservati­on. This budget transfer appears blatantly unconstitu­tional.

None of the above three programs comes anywhere near meeting current demand. To make matters worse, authority was given to the Pennsylvan­ia Legislatur­e to take monies from the Environmen­tal Stewardshi­p Fund and Recycling Fund on a continuing basis and was not limited to just this fiscal year.

Delaware River Basin Commission

This budget failed to provide Pennsylvan­ia’s fair share of funding for the Delaware River Basin Commission. DRBC is an interstate agency charged with the responsibi­lity to manage, protect and improve the water resources for more than 13 million people. The commonweal­th’s Fair Share contributi­on is $893,000 this year, according to the DRBC. The budget provided only $217,000. Since 2015, the majority Republican legislatur­e has blocked full funding of the DRBC in retaliatio­n for the Commission’s refusal to allow fracking in the Delaware River basin.

Plastics

A last-minute provision added by Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman, R-Centre, prohibits the commonweal­th and its local government­s from regulating plastic bags for one year, which is just enough time to block it again in next year’s budget. Senator Corman’s district includes a plastic bag manufactur­ing plant owned by Novolex, the world’s largest manufactur­er of singleuse plastic bags. Wolf vetoed a similar provision in 2017, saying it violated the Environmen­tal Rights Amendment to the state constituti­on. There was no veto this time.

RGGI

There was some hope that this budget might include legislativ­e authorizat­ion for Pennsylvan­ia to join the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. RGGI is a 10 state cap-and-trade program designed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from the electric power sector. Pennsylvan­ia is a major greenhouse gas emitter and joining RGGI would be perhaps the most important thing the commonweal­th could do to curb its emissions. The final budget contained no RGGI language.

Conclusion: Environmen­tal protection fared very poorly in this budget but it was not due to tight fiscal times. In fact, Pennsylvan­ia’s Independen­t Fiscal Office recently projected an $866 million budget surplus for the fiscal year that just ended. Moreover, this budget will deposit almost $300 million into Pennsylvan­ia’s rainy day fund.

Most of these damaging environmen­tal provisions were demanded by Republican budget negotiator­s and, in the end, Governor Wolf was not willing to fight hard enough to keep them from happening. For too long, environmen­tal protection has been the bargaining chip that Democrats in Pennsylvan­ia have traded to get other things.

It’s easy to pay lip service to environmen­tal protection but the critical environmen­tal problems facing our commonweal­th won’t be addressed in any meaningful way until more people are elected on both sides of the aisle that are truly committed to environmen­tal protection.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States