Daily Times (Primos, PA)

Panel’s report on fracking indicts state

A recent grand jury report from Pennsylvan­ia Attorney General Josh Shapiro might seem like a diatribe on the evils of fracking. That is definitely what draws attention.

-

The problem is that is only half the story. The other half is the failings of government.

As attorney general, Shapiro has made a point of being tough on fracking, and the grand jury report delivered in June certainly does that. Its 243 pages cite violations, allege medical fallout and recommend criminal charges against the companies involved.

As a matter of law, any industry found to harm lives and degrade the community will face consequenc­es.

But that is where the failings of government play a role.

“Our investigat­ion … convinced us that (the Department of Environmen­tal Protection) did not take sufficient action in response to the fracking boom, and even now, more than a decade after it began, must do more to fully address the special challenges posed by the industry,” the report stated.

Shapiro’s report alleges that rather than acting as a regulatory agency, following up on the way fracking companies were treating the land, air and water, “some DEP employees saw the job more as serving the industry.”

The job of all state employees is to serve the people. Industry does not need to be viewed as the enemy, whether the agency is DEP or PennDOT or the Department of Health. The mission statement for government workers is to protect the people, to ensure their safety, to make their lives better.

That is the difference between the government and a company that serves an owner or stockholde­rs or a board of directors. A company doesn’t have to be evil to have a different goal — and that goal is to produce a product and make money.

That’s not a bad goal. Over the last 10 or so years, it has provided a lot of jobs and put money into the pockets of Pennsylvan­ia landowners.

But it isn’t an industry’s job to police itself. We don’t expect speeding drivers to stop themselves and write their own tickets. We shouldn’t expect a business will volunteer to conduct itself in a way that may cut into profits or slow down production.

The government sends health inspectors to restaurant­s and nursing homes. The government makes sure deli scales and gas pumps are properly calibrated. Fracking should be no different.

In Gov. Tom Corbett’s four years in office, there were 11,821 inspection­s conducted. That sounds like a lot until you hear Gov. Tom Wolf’s administra­tion had more than 16,000 per year.

The Department of Health has little informatio­n on what the health impacts of fracking might be. The grand jury report blames the department itself for this, as no research has been done.

Pennsylvan­ia is built on energy and industry. It has faced decades of impact on the environmen­t and the people. Acid drainage from coal mining and even road constructi­on has required mitigating to counteract. Pennsylvan­ians still suffer from black lung disease acquired in mines. The state should know there are things to study.

The industry takes issue with Shapiro’s report, which the Marcellus Shale Coalition said “fails to identify any specific instance that substantia­tes its claims of impacts.”

More oversight would address that. Inspection, research and data can all make fracking — or any industry — safer and do the state’s job of serving the people.

—Tribune Review, via the Associated Press

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States