Trump, eyeing undecided voters, loses one during TV exchange

PHILADELPHIA » If President Donald Trump agreed to a Pennsylvania town hall to sway undecided voters, his exchange with a literature professor born with a chronic disease lost him at least one vote in the battleground state.

Ellesia Blaque voted reluctantly for Hillary Clinton in 2016, and dislikes Sen. Kamala Harris’s record as a prosecutor. She hoped that Trump would allay her fear of losing insurance coverage over her preexisting condition.

Instead, the president interrupted her — she politely asked to finish — and then, she thought, politicized the question to attack “Obamacare.”

“I decided that even though I’m dissatisfied, mainly with Kamala Harris, I’m going to vote for Joe Biden,” said Blaque, 57, who lives near Reading and teaches literature of the Black diaspora at Kutztown University. “He (Trump) just reanimated my need to be part of the process.”

Trump, as he did repeatedly with participants at the National Constitution Center on Tuesday, promised Blaque he had a plan in the works to address her concerns.

“We’re going to be doing a health care plan very strongly and protect people with preexisting conditions,” the president said. “If you look at what they want to do, … they will get rid of preexisting conditions, if they go into Medicare for All.”

She didn’t buy it.

“He just fluffed me away like I’m nobody,” Blaque, a longtime Independent who later became a Democrat, told The Associated Press in a phone call Wednesday.

She said she spends $7,000 or more a year on out-of-pocket medical bills, even with good insurance through her state university job. She was born with an inflammatory disease called sarcoidosis, and needs up to a dozen medications to stay alive.

Trump has frequently claimed he will always protect people with preexisting conditions despite evidence to the contrary. The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court for full repeal of the health law, including provisions that protect people with preexisting conditions from health insurance discrimination. Republicans say they’d put new protections in place, but they haven’t spelled them out.