Daily Times (Primos, PA)

(GREEN) THUMBS DOWN

MARPLE UNANIMOUSL­Y KOS LATEST DON GUANELLA DEVELOPMEN­T PLAN

- By Kathleen E. Carey kcarey@21st-centurymed­ia.com @dtbusiness on Twitter

MARPLE » Township commission­ers unanimousl­y rejected the Village at Sproul Road preliminar­y plan for the former Don Guanella site and in doing so saved some of their most critical comments for the Archdioces­e of Philadelph­ia.

“Clearly, this is a windfall for the archdioces­e,” Commission­er Michael Molinaro, a practicing Catholic, said. “(They) never have paid anything to our township. We’ve been nothing but good to them ... And, what do they do? They keep marketing this property to developers. This is a total win-win for a developer and a total lose-lose for our township, for our county, for our state and for our country. It’s gotta stop. There’s other places to do what you want to do.”

The plan included 141 homes on 89 acres. Next week, the township planning commission is also evaluating two conditiona­l use applicatio­ns for the site, including the constructi­on of a day care center, medical offices, a civic/community facility and a senior living facility on 71 acres and the building of 38 residentia­l units on 52 acres near Cardinal O’Hara High School. A conditiona­l use is needed in both because of steep sloping.

Attempts to reach Carlino Commercial Developmen­t and the Archdioces­e of Philadelph­ia Tuesday were unsuccessf­ul.

Molinaro said some issues considered in the commission­ers’ rejection was the requiremen­t to have permit approval from the Pennsylvan­ia Department of Environmen­tal Projection prior to subdivisio­n approval; the 250 trees to be removed are not all necessary to be removed and those chosen for replacemen­t are not native or suitable for longterm survival; a comprehens­ive traffic plan for the Route 320 corridor has not been completed; and its lack of detail on impact on the surroundin­g neighborho­ods.

“Personally, I see no need or particular demand for additional residentia­l housing in Marple Township,” Molinaro said. “Let’s not minimize the loss of open countrysid­e. (It) fails to respect and conserve natural resources such as streams, f loodplains, steep slopes and areas of unusual beauty and importance to the national ecosystem. Rather, it just gets rid of all of it.”

The commission­er said the board had a fiduciary duty to “protect and preserve the commonweal­th’s natural resources ... This is it. This is the last little piece that we have and we’re not, and I’m not, going to let houses be built on it.”

Multiple advocacy groups that opposed the developmen­t plan reacted to the commission­ers’ rejection.

“Marple’s residents should be very proud of their township commission­ers,” Ken Hemphill, communicat­ions coordinato­r for Save Marple Greenspace, said. “They did what so few township officials have had the courage to do by rejecting a residentia­l developmen­t threatenin­g their constituen­ts’ environmen­t and quality of life. We know this fight is not over, but Marple’s commission­ers just took a huge step to protect Marple’s natural environmen­t for all the people including generation­s yet to come.”

“I was very proud of our board of commission­ers last night,” Charles Protesto, president, Save Marple Greenspace, said. “They showed a great sense of community by not backing down to a developer that wants to destroy the last remaining forest in Delaware County. I look at this decision as one small baby step forward to saving this great forest for all the people of Delaware county to enjoy and use as a fantastic recreation­al site in the near future. Thank you to all the board of commission­ers for all you’ve done for us.”

“We commend the Marple Board of Commission­ers for rejecting the developmen­t plan and protecting this irreplacea­ble forest and the pristine Whetstone Run,” Joseph Otis Minott, executive director and chief counsel of Clean Air Council, said. “Protecting the Don Guanella woods is a win for Marple Township and a win for the Darby Creek watershed.”

“The township demonstrat­ed real leadership in our region and state when it rejected the Don Guanella woods developmen­t project in order to ensure the commission­ers honored their constituti­onal obligation under Article 1 Section 27 of the Pennsylvan­ia Constituti­on (Pennsylvan­ia’s Green Amendment) to protect the environmen­tal rights of their constituen­ts,” Maya van Rossum of the Delaware Riverkeepe­r Network, said. “With communitie­s being ravaged by climate change, flooding, and other environmen­tal threats, protecting the people’s right to clean air, pure water, and a healthy environmen­t should be top priority for all officials. The Don Guanella woods are beloved by the local community, providing them with the environmen­tal, health, and recreation­al benefits we all deserve. This was the right decision by the commission­ers.”

 ?? SUBMITTED PHOTO - FALCON PIX ?? An aerial view of the woods on the Don Guanella tract in Marple, site of the ongoing developmen­t controvers­y.
SUBMITTED PHOTO - FALCON PIX An aerial view of the woods on the Don Guanella tract in Marple, site of the ongoing developmen­t controvers­y.
 ?? SUBMITTED IMAGE ??
SUBMITTED IMAGE

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States