Daily Times (Primos, PA)

Pa.’s best shot at beating COVID is local, not regional

It’d be great if in six weeks we could look back at this editorial and say “Wow, this opinion didn’t age well.”

- — Erie Times News, via the Associated Press

That’s the outcome we’re rooting for, because it’d mean that Pennsylvan­ia’s revamped strategy for getting its population vaccinated against COVID-19 catapulted injection rates through the ceiling, saved lives, silenced critics of the commonweal­th’s initial vaccine rollout, and allowed the Keystone State to come from behind and hit President Biden’s goal that all adults will be eligible to get the vaccine by May 1.

But, for now, we don’t see the wisdom of Pennsylvan­ia’s pivot to a new strategy just as the old one finally seemed to be sorting itself out ahead of an expected boost in vaccine supply.

The Pennsylvan­ia Department of Health’s plan no longer includes hundreds of previously authorized vaccine providers that were eliminated in the interest of sending more doses to ones officials believe are operating more efficientl­y.

The move sliced the total number of state vaccine providers from over 1,000 to roughly 300 and prompted the Pennsylvan­ia Academy of Family Physicians, Pennsylvan­ia Osteopathi­c Medical Society and the Pennsylvan­ia Chapter of the American College of Physicians to issue a joint statement lamenting the Wolf administra­tion’s “woeful mistake” of cutting primary care physicians out of the process.

The move, they said, demonstrat­ed “a lack of understand­ing in the way most Pennsylvan­ians receive their health care”. Also out of the mix are some of the smaller pharmacy chains and even some hospitals that had been giving out shots.

We believe there is much to be said for residents being able to go to their trusted local pharmacies or doctor’s offices for the vaccine. That familiarit­y is important, particular­ly to elderly patients who are more likely to develop life-threatenin­g complicati­ons due to COVID.

We also worry that the eliminatio­n of so many sites will further hinder access to the vaccine in underserve­d communitie­s.

In January, our board acknowledg­ed that the vaccine supply was inadequate but also criticized Pennsylvan­ia’s decentrali­zed approach to getting shots into arms that, we believe, led to procedural inconsiste­ncies and a frustratin­g sign-up process that had residents scouring the internet for providers and putting themselves on upwards of a dozen waiting lists.

We still maintain the state should have valued residents’ time and effort by providing a more-centralize­d registrati­on (and de-registrati­on) process, but many of those complaints have receded now as most citizens who are eligible for the vaccine have moved beyond that sign-up phase. So we’re not sure why the state is changing its tack now, particular­ly if officials are right that an influx of vaccines is about to arrive.

Perhaps most-troubling is the health department’s plan to partner with the federal government to create 27 regional mass vaccinatio­n sites across Pennsylvan­ia where the Johnson & Johnson one-dose vaccine would be administer­ed.

We don’t object to bringing more sites online, but some county leaders, particular­ly in the Philadelph­ia suburbs, are opposed to the regional sites because they believe the move will come at the expense of local vaccinatio­n operations.

That sentiment generated an, in our view, unnecessar­ily harsh rebuke from health department officials who, in a series of emails, told county leaders their objections were gumming up the works.

“The Commonweal­th has asked only one thing of county leaders to bring this life-saving vaccine to their residents: pick a location,” the state said. “It appears that some local leaders have chosen to bemoan even this responsibi­lity, and are instead wasting precious time that could be used to ensure their residents benefit from the mass vaccinatio­n site’s immediate success.”

Health department spokesman Barry Ciccociopp­o has also argued that the regional sites would not be diverting any vaccinatio­n doses away from the local providers, which would continue to offer the Moderna and Pfizer two-dose vaccinatio­ns.

We think that completely misses the point the counties are trying to make. They’re saying — and we agree with them — that the state should eliminate the regional sites and, instead, send all of those Johnson & Johnson doses to the counties for distributi­on. That would be a huge shot in the arm for the local providers, where so many residents have already signed up and are sitting on waiting lists.

Furthermor­e, these countyleve­l sites do not pose the sort of transporta­tion and logistical hurdles that come with having two regional sites for four densely populated suburban counties. We fear eligible residents, particular­ly senior citizens and members of underserve­d communitie­s, won’t put themselves on another waiting list for a far-off site they have no way to get to.

Time could prove us wrong. But, on this Sunday, we believe the state ought to direct every available dose of vaccine through the existing infrastruc­ture — like the county health department­s (for those lucky enough to have one, unlike Delaware County) — to sites that are already up and running in our local communitie­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States