Dayton Daily News

Battle over prescripti­on prices comes to Ohio

3.7M Ohioans caught in middle; vote will be in fall.

- By Laura A. Bischoff Columbus Bureau

The first volley of TV ads are launching this week to convince Ohioans how to vote on a drug pricing law on the November ballot.

— The first volCOLUMBU­S ley of TV ads are launching this week in the campaign to convince Ohioans how to vote on a controvers­ial drug pricing law that will be on the November ballot.

The fight over the “Ohio Drug Price Relief Act” is expected to be costly and contentiou­s. A similar measure in California last year drew a record $128 million in campaign spending.

If Ohio voters approve it, the citizen-initiated stat- ute would require state and other public entities to pay no more for prescripti­on drugs than the prices paid by the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, which receives a 20- to 24-percent discount. It would apply to entities including the state of Ohio, the five public pension systems, Ohio Medicaid, the Bureau of Workers’ Compensati­on, state prisons and others. All told, the program would impact 3.7 million Ohioans.

The Relief Act campaign is already drawing hot rhet- oric from both sides.

“The drug industry’s TV ads should come with a U.S. Surgeon General’s warning: The lies being spread by the corporate drug cartel and by their CEOs are hazardous to the health of millions of Ohioans, including 164,000 children,” said Dennis Wil

lard, spokesman for Ohio Taxpayers for Lower Drug Prices. The act is a chance for Ohioans to save $400 million a year and send the message that “they are fed up with the drug industry ripoff,” Willard said.

Ohioans Against the Deceptive RX Ballot Issue point to a 74-page study produced by former Ohio Medicaid officials and funded by the Pharmaceut­ical Research

and Manufactur­ers of America, a trade group of drug makers.

“The policy analysis completed by two former Medicaid directors, Maureen Corcoran and Barb Edwards, along with other state procuremen­t and health pol- icy experts in Ohio, that concludes the ‘Ohio Drug Price Relief Act’ will not work, is flawed and doesn’t address how the current methods and agreements the state has in place for the purchase of prescrip-

tion medication­s for vari- ous programs,” said Jenny Camper, spokeswoma­n for Ohioans Against the Deceptive RX Ballot Issue.

The study concluded that it’s not even possible to determine exactly how much the VA is paying for drugs. Opponents say the Relief Act could have the opposite effect of raising drug prices.

Former U.S. Secretary of Veterans Affairs Anthony Principi warned in a February letter to veterans groups that the proposed law is “a risky scheme that could result in higher prescripti­on drug copays and reduced access to medicines for Ohio’s 866,000 veterans...”

Each side claims a broad coalition of supporters but

there are two big funders squaring off. The Pharmaceut­ical Research and Manufactur­ers of America opposes it while the California-based AIDS Healthcare Foundation supports it. Last fall, California voters rejected Prop 61, a similar issue with the same opponents and supporters. The Los Angeles Times reported that supporters raised $19

million while opponents raised $109 million, making it one of the priciest ballot issues in California history.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States