Dayton Daily News

Officials finalizing details of Trump’s revived travel ban

Homeland Security to implement rules ‘with clear notice.’

- By Matthew Lee and Alicia A. Caldwell

Senior officials WASHINGTON — from the department­s of State, Justice and Homeland Security labored Wednesday to finalize rules for visitors from six mostly Muslim nations who hope to avoid the Trump administra­tion’s revived travel ban and come to the United States.

The deliberati­ons came as U.S. embassies and consulates awaited instructio­ns on how to implement this week’s Supreme Court order that partially reinstated the ban after it was blocked by lower courts. The administra­tion has given itself a deadline of today for implementi­ng the scaled-back ban, which applies to visitors from Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Iran and Yemen.

The justices’ opinion exempts applicants from the ban if they can prove a “bona fide relationsh­ip” with a U.S. person or entity. Government lawyers must determine how to define such a relationsh­ip.

The court offered only broad guidelines — suggesting they would include having a relative, job offer or invitation to lecture in the U.S.

Shortly after the court’s ruling, the State Department advised all U.S. diplomatic posts to await instructio­ns.

Until the new guidance is complete, posts were told to process applicatio­ns as they had been, according to officials familiar with the situation.

Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly said Wednesday that his agency is now starting to examine what more can be done to better determine who is coming into the country and why. During a speech at a security event in Washington he did not address how the travel ban will be implemente­d.

President Donald Trump’s initial travel ban in January led to chaos at airports around the world, but airlines say they don’t expect similar problems this time. After a judge blocked the original ban, Trump issued a scaled-down order and the court’s action Monday further reduced the number of people who would be covered by it.

Also, while the initial order took effect immediatel­y, adding to the confusion, this one does not take effect until 72 hours after the court’s ruling.

Virgin Atlantic airlines said it was working with Customs and Border Protection, the Homeland Security agency responsibl­e for admitting arriving foreigners into the United States. It said anyone with valid travel documents is expected to be able to travel to the U.S. as usual, but it recommende­d that passengers from the six affected countries check first with U.S. Embassies.

Some immigratio­n groups plan to send lawyers to airports in case there are problems. The Dulles Justice Coalition, which establishe­d a pool of volunteer attorneys at Dulles Internatio­nal Airport after the first travel ban, is planning to return to the Virginia airport outside Washington, said D JC board member Sirine Shebaya.

It remained unclear exactly when new instructio­ns would be distribute­d to embassies and consulates. Among other questions lawyers were grappling with was how specific the instructio­ns should be in interpreti­ng a “bona fide relationsh­ip.”

A broad interpreta­tion, for example, could allow a contract or reservatio­n with a rental car agency or hotel in the United States to be considered a legitimate relationsh­ip, the officials said. The Homeland Security Department has said only that it will implement the travel ban “profession­ally, with clear and sufficient public notice.”

The Supreme Court order also placed similar limitation­s on Trump’s plan to temporaril­y halt all refugee admissions.

But that may have minimal effect for now. Of the 50,000 refugees the government planned to accept in the current budget year, more than 48,900 have been allowed to enter the U.S. The State Department has said the few remaining refugees to be admitted this year will not have to prove a “bona fide relationsh­ip.” A new cap won’t be in place until the start of the budget year in October, around the time that the Supreme Court considers the case.

 ?? ALEXANDER F. YUAN / AP ?? Abdullah Alghazali (right) hugs his 13-year-old son, Ali Abdullah Alghazali, after the Yemeni boy stepped out of an arrival entrance at John F. Kennedy Internatio­nal Airport in New York. The revived travel ban goes into effect today.
ALEXANDER F. YUAN / AP Abdullah Alghazali (right) hugs his 13-year-old son, Ali Abdullah Alghazali, after the Yemeni boy stepped out of an arrival entrance at John F. Kennedy Internatio­nal Airport in New York. The revived travel ban goes into effect today.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States