Dayton Daily News

Hopes for immigratio­n deal fade amid barbs

Two GOP senators deny outright Trump’s use of vulgarity at meeting.

- By Mike Debonis

Prospects for a WASHINGTON — bipartisan agreement to protect young immigrants from deportatio­n and prevent a government shutdown later this week faded Sunday as key lawmakers traded sharp accusation­s and President Donald Trump said hopes for a deal were “probably dead.”

Negotiator­s spent last week seeking a solution that would shield young immigrants brought illegally to the United States as children, including the roughly 800,000 who secured work permits under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program created under President Barack Obama.

But a tentative deal worked out Thursday by a small bipartisan group of senators crumbled in an Oval Office meeting in which, according to multiple people involved, an angry Trump asked them why the United States should accept immigrants from “shithole countries” such as Haiti, El Salvador and African nations over those from European countries such as Norway.

A pair of GOP senators — Tom Cotton of Arkansas and David Perdue of Georgia — who attended the meeting and previously said they could not recall the use of the vulgar phrase denied outright on Sunday that Trump had ever said it. That prompted Democrats to accuse them of impugning a fellow senator’s credibilit­y, a developmen­t that could further poison the bipartisan talks.

“Both sides now are destroy- ing the setting in which anything meaningful can happen,” said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

Trump offered a vague denial Friday, and on Sunday, he declared the talks to be failing.

“DACA is probably dead because the Democrats don’t really want it, they just want to talk and take desperatel­y needed money away from our Military,” he said on Twitter.

Democrats have tied the immigratio­n talks to spending negotiatio­ns being held ahead of a Friday shutdown deadline. Republican­s are seeking an increase in military spending; Democrats want a DACA deal and a matching increase in nondefense funding.

The sole Democratic participan­t in the Oval Office meeting, Senate Minority Whip Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, told reporters Friday that Trump had used the vulgar word “not just once but repeatedly” during the meeting. A Republican attendee, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, issued a statement that did not specifical­ly confirm the words used but backed up Durbin’s account.

However, Perdue said in an interview Sunday on ABC’s “This Week With George Stephanopo­ulos” that Trump did not use the word “shithole.”

“I’m telling you he did not use that word, George,” Perdue said, accusing Durbin of making a “gross misreprese­ntation” of what took place in the meeting: “It’s not the first time Senator Durbin has done it, and it is not productive to solving the problem we’re having.”

Cotton said much the same in an interview with CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday: “I didn’t hear

it, and I was sitting no further away from Donald Trump than Dick Durbin was.”

Cotton and Perdue had previously issued a joint state- ment saying that they did “not recall the President saying these comments specifical­ly.”

Both senators on Sunday pointed to a statement Durbin had made in 2013 about comments allegedly made by an unnamed GOP leader during a private White House meeting that were later denied by an Obama administra- tion spokesman. “Senator Durbin has a history of misreprese­nting what happens in White House meetings,” Cotton said.

Ben Marter, a spokesman for Durbin, tweeted a rebuke early Sunday: “Credibilit­y is something that’s built by being consistent­ly honest over time,” he said. “Sen- ator Durbin has it. Senator Perdue does not. Ask anyone who’s dealt with both.”

Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., forcefully backed Durbin, who has authored a bill to grant young illegal immi- grants a path to citizenshi­p and is the leading Demo- cratic negotiator on the DACA issue.

“To impugn (Durbin’s) integrity is disgracefu­l,” Schumer said. “Whether you agree with him on the issues or not, he is one of the most honorable members of the Senate.”

The accounts of the meet- ing, however, have not fallen neatly along party lines.

Be s ides Gr a ham’s endorsemen­t of Durbin’s account, Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., said Sunday on “This Week” that he had spoken to participan­ts in the meet- ing immediatel­y afterward — before The Washington Post publicly reported Trump’s use of the vulgar term.

“They said those words were used before those words went public,” Flake said.

Sen. Michael F. Bennet, D-Colo., speaking Sunday on “Meet the Press,” said, “There’s no question what he said was racist. There’s no question what he said was un-American and com- pletely unmoored from the facts.”

But Paul called those accu- sations unfair and instead accused the media of going “completely bonkers with just ad hominem (attacks) on the president,” blaming the potential failure of the talks on the outcry over Trump’s remarks.

“I do want to see an immi- gration compromise, and you can’t have an immigratio­n compromise if everybody out there is calling the president a racist,” Paul told “Meet the Press” host Chuck Todd.

The tentative deal unveiled Thursday would give legal status and a pathway to citizenshi­p for dreamers while also providing $2.7 billion for border security- some of which could be used to construct the border wall Trump has proposed. The visas now offered under the lottery system would be reallocate­d to other immigratio­n programs, such as one offering temporary status to citizens of nations in crisis - like the ones Trump referenced in his Oval Office remarks.

Trump said in a second tweet Sunday that he wanted more aggressive measures in any deal: “I, as President, want people coming into our Country who are going to help us become strong and great again, people coming in through a system based on MERIT. No more Lotteries!”

Echoing dozens of Democrats, Lewis said he would not vote for any government spending measure until the dreamer issue is settled.

Republican­s cannot pass a government funding bill without Democratic votes. There are 51 Senate Republican­s in a chamber in which 60 votes are needed to pass major legislatio­n, and GOP leaders are also facing problems in the House, where some Republican members have balked at the prospect of passing another stopgap that does not increase military funding.

“We must not give up or give in,” Lewis said. “We must continue to press on and get a deal.”

A federal judge in California last week halted Trump’s decision to end the DACA program and ruled that participan­ts in the program should retain their legal status. U.S. Citizenshi­p and Immigratio­n Services said late Saturday that it would resume accepting renewal requests from people who had already enrolled in the program.

But there is little indication the ruling has helped to defuse the standoff, multiple Democratic aides involved in the effort to secure a compromise said Saturday. On Sunday, the situation’s urgency had not changed. Democrats are trained on securing a legislativ­e solution to the crisis ahead of the Friday deadline.

Flake, who helped negotiate the deal that Trump rejected, said he was still hopeful it could provide the basis for a broad agreement.

“I think that when we get back into town, people will realize there’s only one deal in town,” he said. “There’s only one bipartisan bill, and we need 60 votes, and that bill will be presented with even more Republican­s and Democrats than we have right now.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States