Dayton Daily News

Opioid dangers force police to abandon tests

Large department­s concerned skin will absorb some drugs.

- By Jim Salter

ST. LOUIS — Police who find suspected drugs during a traffic stop or an arrest usually pause to perform a simple task: They place some of the material in a vial filled with liquid. If the liquid turns a certain color, it’s supposed to confirm the presence of cocaine, heroin or other narcotics.

These chemical field tests have been standard procedure for decades, with officers across the country using them every day. Prosecutor­s rely on the results to jail suspects and file criminal charges.

But some large law enforcemen­t agencies have recently abandoned the routine tests out of concern that officers could be exposed to opioids that can be absorbed through the skin or inhaled. Even a minute amount of the most potent drugs, such as fentanyl, can cause violent illness or death.

Police are instead sending suspected drugs to crime laboratori­es, which have quickly become over-burdened, delaying many cases.

“We instituted the precaution­s for self-preservati­on, frankly,” said James Shroba, the agent in charge of the Drug Enforcemen­t Administra­tion office in St. Louis. Agents, he said, began finding fentanyl in everything they seized, including marijuana, cocaine and methamphet­amine.

Over the past 18 months, field testing has been banned by the DEA, state police in Oregon, Arizona, Michigan and Missouri, and several big-city department­s, including New York and Houston.

No police deaths have been blamed on fentanyl, a synthetic opioid developed for cancer patients and others suffering severe pain. But dozens of officers have become ill, including 18 in one raid last year in Pittsburgh.

Illegal raw fentanyl powder can be 50 times more potent than heroin and is often mixed with other street drugs.

Synthetic drugs were blamed for more than 20,000 U.S. overdose deaths in 2016 — double the number from 2015. Prince and Tom Petty are among its victims.

The field test provides only a preliminar­y finding that must be confirmed by a lab.

In fact, a 2016 New York Times report called into question the accuracy of field tests, saying they often produce false positives.

Still, field test results often convince suspects to plead guilty even before the initial indication­s are checked by scientists, prosecutor­s said.

For cases that go to trial, full lab results can take months, which puts some suspects back on the streets for long periods.

State police in Oregon and Missouri stopped field testing last month.

Paige Clarkson, who is in charge of drug prosecutio­ns in Marion County, Oregon, which includes Salem, has been trying to focus on rehabilita­tion for low-level drug offenders.

She worries that the long wait for lab results makes it harder to help defendants.

“If we don’t have a confirmato­ry test and cannot enter into a criminal-justice process, we lose our window to get those people into treatment,” Clarkson said.

In Audrain County, Missouri, prosecutor Jacob Shellabarg­er said he’s concerned that the delays invite more crime if suspects are set free to rob and steal to support their addictions.

Indiana state police put out a bulletin in February 2017 urging law enforcemen­t agencies to avoid field testing “unless the circumstan­ces make it absolutely necessary,” and many heeded the warning.

The state crime lab received 14,266 drug samples last year — over 2,000 more than 2016.

Police are also confiscati­ng more drugs as the opioid crisis worsens, state police spokesman John Perrine said.

In Arizona, state troopers stopped field testing in November 2016.

By August of last year, the backlog at the state crime lab reached 2,300 cases.

“We had to do something,” lab superinten­dent Vince Figarelli said.

So he and his colleagues came up with a plan: Move the field test to the lab. Since October, suspicious material brought to the lab initially gets a preliminar­y color test similar to what officers previously performed in the field.

If that test is positive but the suspect pleads not guilty, the substance gets a full analysis.

If the suspect pleads guilty based on the preliminar­y finding, no further testing is necessary.

The backlog has been cut by two-thirds since October. Figarelli believes it may be eliminated by spring.

Other agencies are adapting too.

The DEA has agreements with state and local labs to perform “presumptiv­e tests” in controlled environmen­ts in cases where immediate results are deemed necessary, Shroba said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States