Ryan: Trump 'trolling with clearances threat
Republican WASHINGTON —
House Speaker Paul Ryan is dismissing President Donald Trump’s threat to revoke the security clearances of six former top national security and intelligence officials who have been critical of his administration.
“I think he’s just trolling people, honestly,” Ryan told reporters at a news conference Tuesday, addressing what opponents and experts say would be an unprece- dented politicization of the clearance process.
“This is something that’s in the purview of the executive branch,” Ryan added with a laugh.
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Monday that the president was “exploring the mechanisms” to strip clearance from former CIA Director John Brennan as well as five other former offi- cials who have held some of the most sensitive positions in government: former FBI Director Jim Comey; James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence; former CIA Director Michael Hayden; former national secu- rity adviser Susan Rice; and Andrew McCabe, who served as Trump’s deputy FBI direc- tor until he was fired in March.
The leaders have served in both Democratic and Repub- lican administrations, including Trump’s. But at least two of the former officials, McCabe and Comey, do not currently have security clearances, mak- ing the threat moot.
Sanders accused the offi- cials of having “politicized and in some cases monetized their public service and security clearances” by making “baseless accusations” that the Trump administration had improper contact with Russia or was influenced by Russia.
“The fact that people with security clearances are mak- ing these baseless charges provides inappropriate legitimacy to accusations with zero evidence,” she said.
Sanders did not cite specific comments made by any of the officials. But the president has been seething over the backlash to his meeting with Russia’s Vladimir Putin and the ongoing investigations into Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election, whether his campaign aides were involved in the effort and whether he obstructed justice.
Experts said there is some dispute about whether the president has the authority to unilaterally terminate a secu- rity clearance, but said such a move would be unprece- dented and ill-advised.
“Legalities aside, it seems like a terrible mistake to use the security clearance system as an instrument of political vendettas,” said Steven Aftergood at the Federation of American Scientists’ Project on Government Secrecy.
Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff of California, a rank- ing member of the House Intel- ligence Committee, tweeted that “politicizing security clearances to retaliate against former national security offi- cials who criticize the President would set a terrible new precedent.”
The threat to deny the offi- cials access to classified information marks the latest escalation in the president’s ongoing war with the members of the U.S. intelligence community. It came hours after Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky tweeted that he would be meeting with Trump to discuss revoking Brennan’s clearance for his scathing criticism of the president’s performance at the summit with Putin.
Paul publicly raised the idea of stripping Brennan’s security clearance — and pen- sion — during appearances on Fox News last week, where he also called Brennan “the most biased, bigoted, overthe-top, hyperbolic sort of unhinged director of the CIA we’ve ever had.”
Former CIA directors and other top national security offi- cials are typically allowed to keep their clearances, at least for some period, as a courtesy and so they can be in a posi- tion to advise their successors. The clearances are also sometimes required to work for government contractors.