Dayton Daily News

New rules for green cards target those on public aid

Law already says qualifiers must prove they won’t be a burden.

- Michael D. Shear and Emily Baumgaertn­er

Tr u mp WASHI N GTON — administra­tion officials announced Saturday that immigrants who legally use public benefits like food assistance and Section 8 housing vouchers could be denied green cards under new rules aimed at keeping out people the administra­tion deems a drain on the country.

The move could force millions of poor immigrants who rely on public assistance for food and shelter to make a difficult choice between accepting finan- cial help and seeking a green card to live and work legally in the United States.

Older immigrants, many of whom get low-cost prescrip- tion drugs through the Medi- care Part D program, could also be forced to stop partic- ipating in the popular benefits program or risk being deemed a “public charge” who is ineligible for legal resident status.

The move is not intended to affect most immigrants who have been granted green cards, but advocates have said they fear that those with legal resident status will stop using public benefits to protect their status. The regula- tion, which the administra­tion said would affect about 382,000 people a year, is the latest in a series of aggres- sive crackdowns by President Donald Trump and his hard-line aides on legal and illegal immigratio­n.

Federal law has always required those seeking green cards to prove they will not be a burden and has taken into considerat­ion the acceptance of cash benefits. But the government has never before considered the use of other public benefits, like assistance for food.

Now, the new regulation — announced on the Department of Homeland Security website — will require that immigratio­n caseworker­s consider the use of pub- lic benefits to be “heavily weighed negative factors” for those who are applying to remain legally in the country on a permanent basis. Those who are deemed likely to become dependent on government assistance will prob- ably be denied. Immigrants could be asked in limited cases to post cash bonds of at least $10,000 to avoid being denied green cards under the new regulation, which does not need congressio- nal approval but must still go through a public review process before it becomes final. Officials said they expected the regulation to become final after being posted to the Fed- eral Register in the coming weeks and undergoing the 60-day review period.

In a news release, the Department of Homeland Security said the new rule would “ensure that those seeking to enter and remain in the United States either temporaril­y or permanentl­y can support themselves financiall­y and will not be reliant on public benefits.”

The 447-page rule, titled “Inadmissib­ility on Public Charge Grounds,” will not apply to families making less than 15 percent of the offi- cial poverty designatio­n, officials said.

Pro-immigrant activists predict that poor immigrants will immediatel­y begin withdrawin­g from public assis- tance programs — even at the risk of losing needed assistance for food, shelter and medicine — out of a fear that they will be denied green cards and will be deported.

There are political implicatio­ns to the move, which comes less than two months before the midterm elec- tions, which will determine who controls the House and the Senate for the next two years of Trump’s tenure.

Focusing on the use of public benefits is often an effec- tive way to galvanize conser- vative supporters. Drawing attention to the use of those benefits by immigrants could be an especially effective way to turn out Trump’s supporters across the country.

Stephen Miller, the pres- ident’s top immigratio­n adviser, has long believed that being tough on immigrants is a winning tactic for Republican candidates who too often — in Miller’s view — have compromise­d with Democrats on the issue. He has pushed hard for the new rule during the past several months.

But the breadth of the effect on immigrants could also energize liberal voters to support Democratic candidates. In New York, for example, city officials esti- mated that under an earlier draft of the regulation, which was leaked to the news media, nearly 1 million peo- ple could be hurt.

They said the children of immigrants who are in the United States legally could be the most vulnerable. Indeed, immigrant parents who work low-wage jobs and rely on assistance may need to remove their children from the programs to keep their families together in the United States. Unauthoriz­ed immi- grants are ineligible for nearly all public benefits.

Trump administra­tion offi- cials say the rule is intended to promote fiscal respon- sibility.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States