Dayton Daily News

EPA aims to triple the pace of deregulati­on during coming year

- By Jacob Holzman

WASHINGTON — The Environmen­tal Protection Agency released a plan for eliminatin­g regulation­s next year that would likely dwarf its current rule-cutting pace.

The agency expects to finalize approximat­ely 30 deregulato­ry actions and fewer than 10 regulatory actions in fiscal 2019, according to the Trump administra­tion’s Unified Agenda, released this week.

Such administra­tive speed would roughly triple the EPA’s pace from the prior year. In fiscal 2018, the agency finalized 10 deregulato­ry actions and three regulatory actions, resulting in an estimated $1.2 billion in cost savings, according to the Office of Informatio­n and Regulatory Affairs.

While the administra­tion has argued that paring back regulation­s will reduce costs, many of the rollbacks have been soundly criticized by environmen­tal groups for weakening public health protection­s and exacerbati­ng climate change.

Under an April 2017 Office of Management and Budget directive, an action is considered “deregulato­ry” if its generates compliance savings for regulated industries, while “regulatory” actions generate compliance costs for the industries.

A potential “deregulato­ry” action heralded by OIRA is a proposed rule that the EPA and the Transporta­tion Department issued in August that would freeze fuel economy and tailpipe emissions standards finalized under the Obama administra­tion at 2020 levels through 2026, instead of enacting more stringent requiremen­ts. It would also revoke a waiver that allows California, along with 12 other states and the District of Columbia, to set tougher standards than federal levels.

In its review, the OIRA called the proposed rollback a “substantia­l” cost-cutter, citing administra­tion estimates that it may save automakers $120 billion to $340 billion.

Also in the agenda, the administra­tion projected that the EPA will finalize in March 2019 a proposal that would withdraw the Obama administra­tion’s Clean Power Plan, which required states to draft plans to cut greenhouse gas emissions from existing coal-powered electricit­y sources and other generation sources.

Another possible rule to be finalized in 2019 is a revision of an Obama administra­tion rule defining “Waters of the United States,” which, in an effort to clarify water protection­s, modified how the federal government determines which waterways are in its jurisdicti­on under the Clean Water Act.

The rule has been a point of consternat­ion from congressio­nal Republican­s who consider it a government overreach. It has also become an issue in ongoing funding arguments. A GOP policy rider that would allow the EPA to withdraw the rule without statutory reviews has been a sticking point in recent Interior-Environmen­t funding discussion­s due to opposition by Democrats.

Yet action on rescinding and replacing the WOTUS rule has been slower than anticipate­d. Then-EPA Administra­tor Scott Pruitt told a Senate panel in May that he expected a proposed withdrawal in the “third quarter” of 2018 and a replacemen­t by year’s end.

Currently, the administra­tion plans to replace the rule in two steps: a final replacemen­t rule would be issued by March 2019, and a rule with its own definition of “Waters of the United States” would come by the following September.

 ?? CHANG W. LEE / THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Power lines run along the Columbia River in Wasco, Ore. The Trump administra­tion plans to increase the pace of deregulato­ry actions in the next year.
CHANG W. LEE / THE NEW YORK TIMES Power lines run along the Columbia River in Wasco, Ore. The Trump administra­tion plans to increase the pace of deregulato­ry actions in the next year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States