Dayton Daily News

Warren’s DNA ‘proof’ shows perils of identifyin­g by race

- Mona Charen

the system. There is a clear career advantage at leading law schools to being a member of a minority. Warren apparently secured a position at the University of Pennsylvan­ia Law School without the minority credential. But while at Penn, she dusted off some “family lore” and began to list herself as Native American. Who knows if this helped get her a slot at Harvard Law?

This charade reveals the bankruptcy of the practice — well-intentione­d at first — of granting benefits based on race. With DNA testing now routine, nearly anyone can rummage around in the genetic attic and come up with an ancestor, especially a distant one, who is of a different ethnic group. In fact, as Warren has been reminded 1,000 times in the past few days, most “white” Americans have roughly the same non-European genetic markers as she. Why Warren thought this excursion “even unto the 10th generation” would bolster her claim is anyone’s guess.

Even if Warren’s interpreta­tion of the genetic test is correct, i.e., it proves that she has some tiny genetic contributi­on from Native Americans, it doesn’t make her disadvanta­ged, does it?

The problem with race preference­s is broader than the inevitable fraud it encourages. What the left did not anticipate when it valorized identity politics for its favored groups was that, eventually, some in the majority would engage in the same kind of self-definition. When it seems that so many major institutio­ns — universiti­es, the news and entertainm­ent media, big corporatio­ns — grant special status to some groups based on identity, the majority will be tempted to seize the same flag.

Also, the very idea of race as a placeholde­r for disadvanta­ge, and particular­ly for historic wrongs, is problemati­c. In 2004, two black Harvard professors, Henry Louis Gates Jr. and Lani Guinier, noted that among Harvard’s black graduates, the majority and perhaps as many as two-thirds, were not the descendant­s of American slaves, but instead were West Indian or African immigrants, the children of immigrants or the products of mixed-race couples.

Data from the Department of Education show that 59 percent of black college students are the children of college graduates. This is less than among whites (75 percent), but still raises the question: Are the black children of college graduates really in need of preference­s?

A 2017 poll found that 55 percent of white Americans believe they face discrimina­tion, and some in the “alt-right” are chugging milk to demonstrat­e the supposed superiorit­y of white people. Sometimes, people can only see how toxic race identity is when the race they fear adopts it.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States