Dayton Daily News

Opinions vary about on-court coaching

- By Sandra Harwitt

Monica Seles SINGAPORE — isn’t a fan of on-court coaching. Lindsay Davenport can see the benefits. Jennifer Capriati is right in the middle.

The three tennis greats took part in a news conference this week at the WTA Finals to discuss the topic, which made plenty of headlines after Serena Williams was penalized for on-court coaching during the U.S. Open final.

The WTA Tour has allowed limited on-court coaching since 2008, while the men’s tour and Grand Slam tournament­s don’t permit any coaching during matches.

“My feeling is, as a former player, I personally don’t like the on-court coaching,” Seles said. “I think as a player at the highest level in your profession, you should be able to think for yourself. My dad always used to say before I stepped on court two things: ‘Move your feet and think.’”

Patrick Mouratoglo­u, the longtime coach of Serena Williams, last week posted a letter on social media supporting on-court coaching. He indicated his opinion derives from the recent incident at the U.S. Open when he was caught signaling from his courtside box to Williams to move forward.

As a rule, Williams doesn’t use the on-court coaching option at WTA tournament­s and denied seeing Mouratoglo­u’s signal in New York, which he admitted to doing during that loss to Naomi Osaka.

“Coaching is a vital component of any sporting performanc­e,” Mouratoglo­u said in his letter. “Yet, banning it almost makes it look as if it had to be hidden or as if it was shameful.”

Davenport, who has had an on-again, off-again coaching relationsh­ip with Madison Keys the past few years, said there are merits to on-court coaching but flaws exist.

“I think another topic to that whole conversati­on is: Is that like another advantage to the top players?” Davenport said. “What about all the players maybe ranked, I don’t know where that number is, 60 and below, that can’t afford a coach every week?”

Capriati isn’t completely convinced, but she’s not against it either. “I’m kind of on the fence about it,” she said. “Part of it is when you’re there, I mean how much can a coach do at that point? If you need a coach at that point, I think you’re kind of lost.

“Then I thought about myself and playing, it could have maybe made all the difference in the world.”

Sascha Bajin, who was a hitting partner for Williams for eight years, is now the head coach for Osaka. He is also not a fan of the concept but he dutifully went on court when Osaka called for a consultati­on midway through the first set against Sloane Stephens on Monday.

“If I have to look back why I started with this sport it was because my father and my mother wanted to teach me something,” Bajin said. “I was learning to overcome problems myself. I think something beautiful about this sport is that it’s really only you and to be a good problem-solver.”

Raemon Sluiter, a former top-50 player who now coaches Kiki Bertens, said on-court coaching provides less-than-appealing optics for the public.

“I think a lot of times when the coaches come on court, they are not necessaril­y used as a help line but more as an ambulance,” Sluiter said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States