Dayton Daily News

Year of change since Parkland massacre

- — MARGARET KRAMER AND JENNIFER HARLAN / ©2019 THE NEW YORK TIMES

On Feb. 14, 2018, a former student slaughtere­d 17 people at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. The next day, David Hogg, a student who survived the attack, expressed his frustratio­n at the pattern of political inaction that seems to follow mass shootings in the United States. He was not surprised that there had been another school shooting, he said, and that fact alone “says so much about the current state that our country is in, and how much has to be done.” “We need to do something,” he said. In the course of the next year, students would change the way the nation handles mass shootings, spurring new gun legislatio­n and school safety measures, and holding to account the adults they felt had failed them. Here’s a look at where they made those changes happen, and where they were disappoint­ed.

The students take the lead

With Parkland, it was the students who set the agenda. Their openness about their pain made them formidable leaders of the movement for gun control, and their displays of strength and utter grief struck a chord with a nation numbed by repeated acts of violence.

In the weeks after the shooting, busloads of Stoneman Douglas students took their case to the Florida capital and to Washington. With a rallying cry of “Never Again,” they gathered support from other young people and activists, and their March For Our Lives campaign spurred huge rallies and hundreds of protests, including a nationwide school walkout. The students’ pleas reached the White House, imploring President Donald Trump to better protect schools and limit access to guns.

And the movement brought youth activism to a new age — finding global power in social media and pushing public officials to acknowledg­e their accountabi­lity.

The adults are held to account

Stoneman Douglas students and parents were outraged by what they viewed as gross incompeten­ce on the part of school and law enforcemen­t officials. Video showed that a sheriff’s deputy assigned to the school did not enter the building as the attack unfolded. Seven other deputies remained outside as gunshots rang out, a state commission found. And another officer prevented paramedics from entering.

The school district also appeared to have missed several warning signs about the former student charged in the massacre, Nikolas Cruz. The parents of two 14-yearold students who were killed decided to run for the school board to fix what they thought went wrong. One of them won.

And in January, Florida’s new Republican governor, Ron DeSantis, suspended Sheriff Scott Israel for his “neglect of duty” and “incompeten­ce.” Israel, who is a Democrat and a vocal opponent of the National Rifle Associatio­n, continues to insist that the criticism of him is politicall­y motivated and that “there was no wrongdoing on my part.” Multiple deputies have also been suspended, and one ultimately resigned.

New focus on mental health and red flag laws

In the case of Cruz, the warning signs were many. There were the boasts about killing animals, the expulsion, the stalking of a female classmate, the repeated calls from his mother to the police. School counselors and a sheriff ’s deputy decided at one point that he should be forcibly committed for psychiatri­c evaluation, only to apparently change their minds the next day. Multiple tips to the FBI were left uninvestig­ated — one woman told the bureau’s tip line she was worried about Cruz going “into a school and just shooting the place up.” Weeks later, he would use his legally purchased semi-automatic AR-15 rifle to do just that.

At that time, there was no law in Florida that would have prevented Cruz from buying a gun or would have allowed the police to take away his weapon. A gun control bill the state passed in March now allows law enforcemen­t — with judicial approval — to bar a person deemed dangerous from owning guns for up to a year.

Gun control proves harder at the national level

State legislatur­es, both Republican- and Democratic-controlled, passed 76 gun control laws in the past year — from bans on bump stocks and caps on magazine sizes to new minimum-age requiremen­ts and expanded background checks. Among the victories for gun control advocates was an omnibus bill in Florida that raised the minimum age to purchase a firearm in the state to 21 and extended the waiting period to three days. In all, more than half the states passed at least one gun control measure in 2018, with Washington and New York joining the trend in 2019.

At the same time, there were significan­tly fewer new state laws expanding gun rights in 2018 than the year before, according to an end-of-year report by the national advocacy group Giffords. Data provided by the NRA also indicated that the number of enacted gun control measures outnumbere­d pro-gun measures for the first time in at least six years.

But at the federal level, any momentum for change was quickly stymied by partisan gridlock. Republican leaders in Congress remained silent as their Democratic colleagues called, once again, for changes in the wake of a mass shooting. And the NRA pressed lawmakers, including the president, to give priority to the interests of gun owners.

In the end, the only significan­t national change was a ban on bump stocks — which members of both parties had been calling for since the Las Vegas shooting in October 2017. The House of Representa­tives, where Democrats took power in January, has now made gun safety a priority — but with a Republican Senate and president, the chances of any such legislatio­n moving beyond the House are virtually nil.

From protests to the polls

When it became clear that Congress would not act on guns, the Parkland students turned their attention to rallying young voters and increasing turnout in the midterm elections in November.

Madison Leal, a student at Stoneman Douglas, said in March about politician­s who would not take action: “I’m going to vote them out of office. And so is my entire generation. And they’ll be sorry then.”

In the summer, a busload of students traveled the country on a Road to Change tour aimed at registerin­g young voters. In tandem with various voter groups and celebritie­s promoting registrati­on, the Parkland students helped spike record numbers for young voter registrati­on. The March For Our Lives campaign reported a 10 percent increase in youth turnout in 2018, compared with the previous midterm elections in 2014.

Two dozen pro-gun candidates were defeated for House seats, though 88 of 129 candidates backed by the NRA did win.

 ?? EVE EDELHEIT / NEW YORK TIMES ?? Since the massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas last year, many students have become a force for gun control legislatio­n and boosted the youth vote.
EVE EDELHEIT / NEW YORK TIMES Since the massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas last year, many students have become a force for gun control legislatio­n and boosted the youth vote.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States