Dayton Daily News

Trump isn’t bothering with racist dog whistles anymore

- Paul Krugman Paul Krugman writes for the New York Times.

Well, the dog whistle days are over. Republican­s are pretty much back to being racists right out in the open.

As everyone knows, Donald Trump recently attacked four progressiv­e members of Congress, saying that they should “go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came.” As it happens, three of the four were born in the U.S., and the fourth is a duly naturalize­d citizen. All are, however, women of color.

Sorry, there’s no way to both sides this, or claim that Trump didn’t say what he said. This is racism, plain and simple — nothing abstract about it. And Trump obviously isn’t worried that it will backfire.

This should be a moment of truth for anyone who describes Trump as a “populist” or asserts that his support is based on “economic anxiety.” He’s not a populist, he’s a white supremacis­t. His support rests not on economic anxiety, but on racism.

And since we’re having this moment of clarity, there are several other points we should address.

First, this isn’t just about Trump; it’s about his whole party.

I don’t just mean the almost complete absence of condemnati­on of Trump’s racism on the part of prominent Republican­s, although this cowardice was utterly predictabl­e. I mean that Trump isn’t alone in deciding that this is a good time to bring raw racism out of the closet.

Last week Bill Lee, the Republican governor of Tennessee, signed a proclamati­on ordering a day to honor the Confederat­e general Nathan Bedford Forrest, whom he described as a “recognized military figure.” Indeed, Forrest was a talented military commander. He was also a traitor, a war criminal who massacred African-American prisoners, and a terrorist who helped found the Ku Klux Klan.

Put it this way: The Nazis had some very good generals, too.

Second, although most of the commentary focuses on Trump’s demand that native-born Americans “go back” to their home countries, his descriptio­n of their imaginary homelands as “crime infested” deserves some attention, too. For his fixation on crime is another manifestat­ion of his racism.

I’m not sure how many people remember Trump’s inaugural address, which was all about “American carnage” — an alleged epidemic of violent crime sweeping our nation’s cities. He didn’t explicitly say, but clearly implied, that this supposed crime wave was being perpetrate­d by people with dark skins. And, of course, both Trump and the Trumpist media go on all the time about immigrant criminalit­y.

In reality, violent crime in America’s big cities is near historical lows, and all the available evidence suggests that immigrants are, if anything, less likely than the native-born to commit crimes. But the associatio­n between nonwhites and crime is a deeply held tenet among white racists, and no amount of evidence will shake their belief.

Oh, and the real “American carnage” is the surge in “deaths of despair” from drugs, suicide and alcohol among less-educated whites. But this doesn’t fit the racist narrative.

Finally, the G.O.P.’s new comfort level with open racism should serve as a wake-up call to Democrats, both centrists and progressiv­es, who sometimes seem to forget who and what they’re confrontin­g.

It’s tempting to say that Republican claims to support racial equality were always hypocritic­al; it’s even tempting to welcome the move from dog whistles to open racism. But if hypocrisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue, what we’re seeing now is a party that no longer feels the need to pay that tribute. And that’s deeply frightenin­g.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States