Dayton Daily News

Ohio budget receives bipartisan support

- Thomas Suddes Thomas Suddes is an adjunct assistant professor at Ohio University. Send email to tsuddes@gmail.com.

Whatever a voter thinks of Ohio’s new budget (House Bill 166) or the customer bailout of FirstEnerg­y Solutions’ nuclear power plants, they became law with backing from both Republican­s and Democrats.

True, one reason for cross-aisle deals in Ohio’s House is because Republican Larry Householde­r, of Perry County’s Glenford, was elected speaker in January over Republican former Speaker Ryan Smith, of Gallia County’s Bidwell, thanks to votes from Democrats

Householde­r won 52-46. Of his 52 backers, 26 were Republican­s, 26, Democrats. Of Smith’s backers, 34 were Republican­s, 12, Democrats. Bottom line: Householde­r wouldn’t be sitting in the Ohio House’s so-called Lincoln chair (the speaker’s seat) if Democrats hadn’t supported him.

The story’s a little different in the Senate, which is 24-9 Republican. The GOP’s run the Sen

ate, now led by President Larry Obhof, of Medina, since January 1985. (At the time, the Billboard Hot 100’s No. 1 single, Wikipedia reports, was “Like a Virgin” by Madonna; she’ll be 61 next month.) In the Senate, Democrats have had to bargain with Republican­s for 34 years.

Sure, Republican­s could have passed the 2,602page, $69.8 billion budget without Democratic votes. (For every $1 in the budget, about 47 cents will pay for Medicaid.) The Senate’s budget vote was 29-1; the only “no” was Sen. Teresa Fedor, a Toledo Democrat. The significan­ce of “yes” votes from other Senate Democrats is this: Most obviously found parts of the budget, if not congenial, then at least helpful to their districts. The contrast with Mitch McConnell’s U.S. Senate couldn’t be starker.

The Ohio House’s budget vote, 75-17, was also cross-party; 20 of the House’s 38 Democrats joined 55 of the 61 Republican­s in voting “yes.” Among Democratic “yeses” were House Minority Leader Emilia Sykes, of Akron; former House Minority Leader Fred Strahorn, of Dayton; and Rep. Jessica Miranda, of Forest Park. As in the Senate, the budget could have passed without Democrats. But more than half the House’s Democrats evidently didn’t have huge problems with the budget, perhaps because

of Republican Gov. Mike DeWine’s big push for more and better services for children.

But the FirstEnerg­y Solutions bailout — which Ohio electricit­y customers will pay for — passed only because of Democratic “yes” votes. The bailout required 50 House votes; it got 51: Republican­s provided 42 votes, Democrats, nine. (Among the nine, one is a southwest Ohioan: Rep. Catherine D. Ingram, of Cincinnati.)

Miami Valley Republican­s who voted “yes” on the Ohio House’s nuclear bailout roll-call were Reps. Niraj Antani, of Miamisburg; Jim Butler, of Oakwood; Sarah Carruthers, of Hamilton; George Lang,

of West Chester; Scott Lipps, of Franklin; Rick Perales, of Beavercree­k; Phil Plummer, of Dayton; Todd Smith, of Germantown; Nino Vitale, of Urbana; Shane Wilkin, of Hillsboro (co-sponsor of the bailout); and Paul Zeltwanger, of Mason.

The bailout required at least 17 Senate votes. It drew “yeses” from 16 Senate Republican­s (including Sens. Bob Hackett, of London; Matt Huffman, of Lima; Peggy Lehner, of Kettering; Bob Peterson, of Washington Court House; and Steve Wilson, of Maineville). But three Democrats voted “yes,” making the tally 19-12 — and passing the bailout. Democratic “yeses” were Minority Leader Kenny Yuko, of suburban Cleve

land’s Richmond Heights; Sen. Teresa Fedor, of Toledo; and Sen. Sandra Williams, of Cleveland.

The National Conference of State Legislatur­es reported last year on why some state’s legislatur­es — unlike Congress — negotiate policy difference­s rather than go into gridlock. One factor discouragi­ng confrontat­ion in state capitols: “A determinat­ion (by state legislator­s) to get things done,

often expressed as ‘We’re not D.C.’”

No, the Statehouse isn’t.

And for that, Ohioans should thank their lucky stars.

The significan­ce of ‘yes’ votes from other Senate Democrats is this: Most obviously found parts of the budget, if not congenial, then at least helpful to their districts.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States