Dayton Daily News

U.S., China to talk trade but with low hopes

Analyst: Negotiator­s still facing same issues between nations.

- By Joe McDonald

Two months after BEIJING —

U.S.-Chinese talks aimed at ending a tariff war broke down, both sides are trying to temper hopes for a breakthrou­gh when negotiatio­ns resume today on an array of disputes that has grown to include tension over China’s tech giant Huawei.

Rhetoric has hardened despite the June agreement by Presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping to revive efforts to end the costly fight over China’s tech- nology ambitions and trade surplus.

“I don’t know if they’re going to make a deal,” Trump said Friday. “Maybe they will, maybe they won’t. I don’t care.” He repeated his claim that the United States is prospering by “taking in tens of billions of dollars” from his tariff hikes on Chinese products. In reality, those are paid by U.S. companies and consumers who buy Chinese goods.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Trade Representa­tive Robert Ligh- thizer are due to meet today and Wednesday in Shanghai with a delegation led by China’s economy czar, Vice Premier Liu He.

Chinese leaders are resist- ing U.S. pressure to roll back plans for government-led developmen­t of industry leaders in robotics, artificial intelligen­ce and other tech- nologies. Washington complains those efforts depend on stealing or pressuring foreign companies to hand over technology. Some American officials worry the U.S. is losing its lead.

For their part, American negotiator­s have resisted Beijing’s demand that they remove all punitive tariffs immediatel­y. Washington wants to keep some in place to ensure China keeps its promises.

“The same issues that caused the talks to break down are still there,” said Julian Evans-Pritchard of Capital Economics.

“Neither side seems any closer to offering major concession­s,” said EvansPritc­hard. “It’s very hard to see how they can reach a deal this time if they were unable to do that in March.”

U.S. priorities include “industrial policy issues such as intellectu­al prop- erty rights, forced technol- ogy transfer and subsidies for (Chinese) state-owned enterprise­s,” said Jeff Moon, a former U.S. diplomat and trade official who special- ized in China. “Enforcing any agreements is also a top priority.”

Economists are warning that with both sides still far apart, the truce is fragile.

After talks broke down in May, the Trump administra- tion imposed curbs on U.S. technology sales to Huawei, the biggest global maker of network gear for phone com- panies and the No. 2 smartphone brand. U.S. officials view Huawei as a national security threat and warn that its equipment could be used for cyberespio­nage.

Beijing retaliated by announcing it would create its own list of “unreliable entities” subject to unspecifie­d controls. Authoritie­s have yet to announce which companies might be targeted.

On the eve of the talks, the Chinese government accused Washington on Monday of “arrogance and selfishnes­s” after Trump pressed for the World Trade Organizati­on to stop allowing Beijing and other government­s to receive more lenient treatment as developing economies.

Trump told Lighthizer in a memo Friday the he wants the WTO to prevent member government­s from claiming developing country status if their economies do not need beneficial treatment. Developing countries are allowed more time to open their economies and more leeway to subsidize exports.

China needs that status to “achieve real trade fairness,” said a foreign ministry spokeswoma­n, Hua Chunying.

The Trump administra- tion’s remarks “have further exposed its wayward arrogance and selfishnes­s,” Hua said.

Trump has suggested he would consider easing up on Huawei if it meant getting a better trade deal.

“Trump — in his eagerness to find negotiatin­g leverage — linked national security and trade with regard to Huawei to create a new bargaining chip,” Moon said. Members of Congress from both par- ties likely would object to any concession­s on Huawei.

The tariff hikes are battering exporters on both sides and disrupting trade in goods from soybeans to medical devices. China’s imports of American goods fell 31.4% in June from a year ago while exports to the United States fell 7.8%.

Mnuchin is usuallyupb­eat in public about the talks. But he tried to temper hopes when he announced plans for the Shanghai meeting, telling broadcaste­r CNBC that negotiator­s face “a lot of issues” and he expects to hold more talks, probably in Washington.

“China and the United States will face tough nego- tiations. The gap between their current positions is very big,” said the Global Times, published by the ruling Communist Party news- paper People’s Daily.

Washington “still hopes to force Chinese concession­s,” the newspaper said. It rejected “destructiv­e surgery on China’s economic system” and called on Wash- ington “not to deny the legit- imacy of China’s demands.”

China agreed earlier to narrow its multibilli­on-dollar trade surplus with the United States by purchas- ing more American soybeans, natural gas and other exports. But it revoked that pledge after one of Trump’s tariff hikes last year.

Chi n ese leaders have grown more skittish, saying any agreement must be “balanced,” reflecting frus- tration that American officials would portray the talks as a victory for Washington, with China bearing the costs.

“If the responsibi­lities all come from China, it is not an agreement but a surrender,” said Tu Xinquan, director of the China Institute of Internatio­nal Trade and Economics.

Moon, who runs the China Moon Strategies consultanc­y, dismissed Beijing’s call for balance as “an excuse to object to reforming even the most protection­ist aspects of China’s trade policy.”

Trump’s demands for changes in Chinese industrial policy strike at the heart of a state-led developmen­t model the ruling Communist Party sees as a path to prosperity and greater global influence.

The decision to add Huawei Technologi­es Ltd. to a U.S. “entity list” that limits exports threatens China’s first global tech brand.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States