Dayton Daily News

Mueller’s testimony good news for Trump — and Pelosi

- Marc A. Thiessen Marc A. Thiessen writes for the Washington Post.

Robert Mueller’s disastrous testimony has taken the wind out of the sails of the Democratic impeachmen­t drive. That is a victory for President Trump. But it also was good news for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

For most Americans, the Mueller investigat­ion was about whether the president of the United States conspired with Russia to steal the 2016 election. Americans were told that the president was a traitor who had colluded with Vladimir Putin to subvert U.S. democracy. So, when Mueller released his report in April finding that “the investigat­ion did not establish that the Trump Campaign coordinate­d with the Russian government in its election interferen­ce activities,” the country breathed a sigh of relief and was ready to move on.

Pelosi was listening and tried to steer her caucus away from the suicidal push for impeachmen­t.

But many Democrats refused to listen to her or the American people. Instead of focusing on substantiv­e issues, they kept focusing on investigat­ing Trump. Despite Mueller’s public declaratio­n that he did not want to appear before Congress because “the report is my testimony,” they insisted he appear — even threatenin­g to subpoena him. The prospect of Mueller’s testimony loomed for months.

That was a huge risk. The Washington Post reports that Democratic Congressio­nal Campaign Committee (DCCC) conducted focus groups in key battlegrou­nds that showed “the public’s impression of the new House majority is bound up in its battles with Trump, not in its policy agenda” and the party’s preoccupat­ion with investigat­ions was “overshadow­ing the party’s agenda, threatenin­g its grip on the House in 2020.”

Democrats took the House in 2018 by focusing on kitchen-table issues like health care and prescripti­on drug prices to flip districts Trump won in 2016. But the impeachmen­t obsession is threatenin­g vulnerable freshman Democrats in those Trump districts. Rep. Ben McAdams, D-Utah, who won in a Trump district, complained that “I’m spending zero hours per week, zero minutes per week on investigat­ions and impeachmen­t, and I’m spending a lot of time on the issues that my district sent me here to work on . ... But it doesn’t break through.”

Many of McAdams’s colleagues calculated that Mueller’s testimony would provide sound bites that would be politicall­y devastatin­g for the president. Their bet did not pay off. Mueller sounded fragile and confused, and gave Democrats no new ammunition to use against Trump. To the contrary, when he was asked by Rep. Douglas A. Collins, R.-Ga., “At any time in the investigat­ion, was your investigat­ion curtailed or stopped or hindered?” Mueller replied “no.” It’s hard to make a case for obstructio­n when the special counsel says he was not obstructed.

Democrats’ impeachmen­t drive was never going to work.

So, the Mueller debacle was a gift to Pelosi. She gave her Democrats a shot to make their case for impeachmen­t, and it blew up in their faces. Yet despite the obvious failure of the Mueller hearings, some pro-impeachmen­t Democrats are undeterred. Politico reports that in a closed-door meeting after Mueller left Capitol Hill, House judiciary committee chairman Jerry Nadler, D.-N.Y., pushed to launch impeachmen­t proceeding­s. Talk about a tin ear.

Pelosi understand­s that if Democrats run in 2020 on impeachmen­t and Socialism they could lose not just the White House, but their House majority as well. The question is: Does her caucus finally get it — or will they continue their suicidal impeachmen­t drive?

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States